Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
Still, from picture size comparisons, it looks like the Browning Hi-Power is more or less as big as a Beretta 92, albeit slightly thinner.
|
The 92/96s are huuuge pistols.
The BHP is closer in size to a G19 but carries much easier IWB since they are both thin and round.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
Is it really easier and more effective to make a pistol from scratch than spend two days modifying one?
|
Yes. While the CNC is running the operator can go do something else. And doesn't require a master welder which a completely separate skillset.
..and since the machine is set up to do an operation, don't do it once, do it twenty times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
Why do military and police armouries sometimes bother to do extensive modifications on old ones, like rechambering them or suchlike, then?
|
They don't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
That looks like they went with the 'building a whole new weapon based on the Browning' route. Is that a false impression on my part?
|
That is correct. They were already making BHP clones. It is easier to make them in the desired abbreviated form than modify them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
So if you need one hundred Bulk -1 weapons and have access only to Bulk -2 semi-autos and very old Bulk -2 revolvers, it's clearly easier to modify the revolvers?
|
Lord yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
Ok. Which would you think was more practical as the basis for a 'Fitzed' self-defence weapon in the modern day; a S&W Model 10 .38/200 made during WWII or a Webley IV or VI in .38/200 made sometimes between 1930-1945?
|
The S&W. Though the .38/200/.38S&W cartridge has been wholly obsolete for decades.