Restraining Order vs. Out to Lunch

Andrew Hackard · 10-21-2012, 01:21 PM

I'm going to take another look at Restraining Order; I think my previous ruling may have been overly broad. (And certainly the interpretation being given it in this thread is broader than I intended.)

For now, if you use Restraining Order to force a player to remove a card that gave a combat bonus, that combat bonus is negated (because the card is no longer there). Other cards may or may not be, depending on their effects. I will try to give a more complete answer when I have more time to consider the question.

10-21-2012, 01:21 PM	#4
Andrew Hackard *Munchkin* Line Editor Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Austin, TX	Re: Restraining Order vs. Out to Lunch I'm going to take another look at Restraining Order; I think my previous ruling may have been overly broad. (And certainly the interpretation being given it in this thread is broader than I intended.) For now, if you use Restraining Order to force a player to remove a card that gave a combat bonus, that combat bonus is negated (because the card is no longer there). Other cards may or may not be, depending on their effects. I will try to give a more complete answer when I have more time to consider the question. __________________ Andrew Hackard, *Munchkin* Line Editor If you have a question that isn't getting answered, we have a thread for that. Let people like what they like. Don't be a gamer hater. #PlayMunchkin on social media: Twitter \|\| Facebook \|\| Instagram \|\| YouTube Follow us on Kickstarter: Steve Jackson Games and Warehouse 23