Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2012, 06:42 PM   #1
DanHoward
 
DanHoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

The above list is resistance against points, which is all that really mattered historically. The most common threat in any battle by a long margin was from spears and arrows.
DanHoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 07:51 PM   #2
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHoward View Post
The above list is resistance against points, which is all that really mattered historically. The most common threat in any battle by a long margin was from spears and arrows.
PCs would still be pretty dumb to not keep at least one blunt weapon for all those mail wearers. The handicap is too severe for it not to have been commonly known.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 09:54 PM   #3
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

The problem with scaling weight to HP (or ST) is that it significantly (and unrealistically) encourages small characters. If you want, though, a standard estimate of human surface area is sqrt (weight * height / 3600 ), where weight is in kg, height is in cm, and area is in m^2 (yeah, that's some horrible unit confusion there). That works out to 2/3 * sqrt(W*H) if we want square feet, pounds, and feet. Thus, for a 6'/180 lb man (183cm/81kg) we get or 21.9 sf or 2.03m^2.

Other than that, I'd probably give a limitation on ST, or a flat disadvantage, for unusually heavy gear. One option is fractional SM; each .1 SM increases the weight of armor by 10%, but has none of the other effects of SM, and provides a 1% limitation on ST.
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 02:29 AM   #4
jacobmuller
 
jacobmuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Not in your time zone:D
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
a standard estimate of human surface area is sqrt (weight * height / 3600 ), where weight is in kg, height is in cm, and area is in m^2 (yeah, that's some horrible unit confusion there). That works out to 2/3 * sqrt(W*H) if we want square feet, pounds, and feet. Thus, for a 6'/180 lb man (183cm/81kg) we get or 21.9 sf or 2.03m^2.
I endeavour to acknowledge the wisdom of KISS and for a similar query was pointed to Basic Lift as a racial mean.

(one of the reasons I love GURPS is my occasional OCD trips where I spend hours figuring out the precise numbers for something and then realise GURPS had it covered with 3d and a mod).
__________________
"Sanity is a bourgeois meme." Exegeek
PS sorry I'm a Parthian shootist: shiftwork + out of country = not here when you are:/
It's all in the reflexes
jacobmuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 03:22 AM   #5
Trachmyr
 
Trachmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
The problem with scaling weight to HP (or ST) is that it significantly (and unrealistically) encourages small characters. If you want, though, a standard estimate of human surface area is sqrt (weight * height / 3600 ), where weight is in kg, height is in cm, and area is in m^2 (yeah, that's some horrible unit confusion there). That works out to 2/3 * sqrt(W*H) if we want square feet, pounds, and feet. Thus, for a 6'/180 lb man (183cm/81kg) we get or 21.9 sf or 2.03m^2.
Thanks for the formula, I've seen a few on the web, but haven't converted/simplified them yet.

While heavier/lighter armor may give one benefit to smaller characters, I think that if the increase is kept linear* rather than exponential, it should be ok... and besides, bigger characters do need heavier armor. But going to a linear increase means that larger characters will still be able to carry more in relationship to samller characters.

* The reason I'm going with a linear increase is that the Height/Weight chart seems to suggest a square increase to weight based on ST rather than cubed for individuals of the same race, representing increased efficiency as well as mass. Thus surface area would be linear rather than square based.

Quote:
Other than that, I'd probably give a limitation on ST, or a flat disadvantage, for unusually heavy gear. One option is fractional SM; each .1 SM increases the weight of armor by 10%, but has none of the other effects of SM, and provides a 1% limitation on ST.
See, I'm of a slightly different mindset in that I feel HP is underpriced, but by using it to represent mass, it is balanced again. I'd go the route of allowing a 50% enhancement of extra HP for Massless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polydamas View Post
I wouldn't tie surface area rigidly to ST, because ST can easily vary 30% from that predicted by bodyweight.
I tie it to HP, and while the ratio of mass to surface area can vary, it's the best stat to measure it by. I'm all for a perk or quirk to vary mass by 1 step greater/lesser than HP indicates. I also would place greater restictions on lowering HP, so that it can't be more than 15% lower than ST.

Quote:
Keep in mind that GURPS DR is very coarse ... 13-15 oz leather might provide DR 1.5 but the rules have to reflect the empirical reality that layered or quilted linen provides more protection per kilo than most leathers.
Generally 13/15 oz. leather is considered Armor-Grade, and should be DR2, 16/18 oz was extremely heavy and occassionally used in Buff Coats designed to stop sword swings of lighter blades (DR2 +1 vs. Cut, use Edge-Protection rules), in comparison, thick shoe leather for soles is also 13/15 ounce.

The rule modifications I suggest do not alter the relationship of Leather to other Armors, including Textiles. It makes a reduction across the board then modifies for size, making the Base Table assume HP 12. The rules for Tailoring is really where I try to get Leather and Textiles back realistic numbers, by making Tailoring cheaper for those materials. But, layered & quilted linen will remain superior to Leather.
Trachmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 06:04 AM   #6
DanHoward
 
DanHoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trachmyr View Post
Generally 13/15 oz. leather is considered Armor-Grade, and should be DR2, 16/18 oz was extremely heavy and occassionally used in Buff Coats designed to stop sword swings of lighter blades (DR2 +1 vs. Cut, use Edge-Protection rules), in comparison, thick shoe leather for soles is also 13/15 ounce.
SCA "armour-grade" doesn't count.
Leather shrinks a lot when subjected to hardening treatments.
Anything can stop a sword cut. Proper armour will stop a point. Leather has a lot of trouble doing this unless it is layered.
DanHoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 09:48 AM   #7
Polydamas
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trachmyr View Post
Generally 13/15 oz. leather is considered Armor-Grade, and should be DR2, 16/18 oz was extremely heavy and occassionally used in Buff Coats designed to stop sword swings of lighter blades (DR2 +1 vs. Cut, use Edge-Protection rules), in comparison, thick shoe leather for soles is also 13/15 ounce.
Considered by whom?
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper

This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature
Polydamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 11:14 PM   #8
Henchman99942
 
Henchman99942's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

Has anyone worked on using these for other Leather (& Textile) equipment?

Examples: backpacks, bags, pouches, etc...?

How about having higher tech versions of items that first came about in lower tech incarnations?

A tech 7 backpack should weigh less and carry more than a tech 1 backpack.

Is the best solution to use advanced materials as a modifier?

*********

(Additional questions have been resolved)

Last edited by Henchman99942; 12-04-2012 at 11:05 PM. Reason: Additional questions have been resolved
Henchman99942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 10:59 PM   #9
Polydamas
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

I wouldn't tie surface area rigidly to ST, because ST can easily vary 30% from that predicted by bodyweight. Keep in mind that GURPS DR is very coarse ... 13-15 oz leather might provide DR 1.5 but the rules have to reflect the empirical reality that layered or quilted linen provides more protection per kilo than most leathers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyndaran View Post
PCs would still be pretty dumb to not keep at least one blunt weapon for all those mail wearers. The handicap is too severe for it not to have been commonly known.
The trouble is that in many cases, a spear or bow was still a better weapon. Most opponents will have plenty of targets with no armour, you have to get very close to hit someone with a mace held in your hand, and you have to want to kill or maim them. Sidearms like swords, axes, and maces were normally backup weapons.

Dan's comments about the most common threat aren't a bad approximation for societies with iron. Lots of societies without iron relied heavily on clubs and slings.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper

This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature
Polydamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 02:02 AM   #10
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: [LT] Leather (& Textile) weight issues and Scaling to size.

It still seems like being an armored giant with one huge big unblinking eye and getting suprised when someone throws things at that one huge target.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
leather, low-tech, scaling rules, textiles


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.