Quote:
Originally Posted by vierasmarius
The second half of the first paragraph is describing a particular circumstance (the Psi makes his roll by a MoS of 3+Target SM) in which this particular rule (inanimate objects resist with HT) can be waived. The second paragraph is referring to that option, saying that the HT roll is ignored for the sake of speed and simplicity, but that if there's significant tension involved (or if the object is a Gadget) then it should always get a HT roll.
|
I can see how just reading the text leads to that. What about the new paragraph? That implies a separate concept, which is what suggests the application to the general rule. That could be an editorial misplacement, I suppose. Maybe we should just ask Rev the intent of those lines *lightbulb*