Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunrunners_Fire
Either/Or Limitations:
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -5), -0.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -4), -1%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -3), -2.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -2), -5%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -1), -6.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( -0), -9% ... Either (Resistible (HT) (-0)) Or (Resistible (Will) (-0)) is -9%.
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +1), -12.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +2), -16%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +3), -20.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +4), -25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +5), -30.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +6), -36%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +7), -42.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +8), -49%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +9), -56.25%
Resistible ( HT or Will) ( +10), -64%
... I would rule that the above is how to calculate " Resisted by the highest of HT or Will" and that " Resisted by the lowest of HT or Will" would require the addition of Selectivity, +10% to the advantage itself.
|
That makes no sense. Resistible by the Higher of HT or Will is always worse than Resistible by HT (or Will). Thus, the limitation value must be
more, not less, than the original.
I'd suggest a flat -20% to the limitation value per attribute after the first.