Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbsmith
1) shouldn't be a problem
2) I'll think on that. I'll probably add an "atmospheres" listing along with the depth.
|
Thanks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbsmith
3) Already assumes "streamlining" if you have Force Wings for Air Performance 1 & 2, not streamlined for 3 & 4 (unless the ship actually has the streamlining option, in which case all profiles naturally assume streamlining)..
|
That's odd. When I didn't check Streamlining with Force Wings, Air Performance 1 & 2 used the unstreamlined airspeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbsmith
4) What numbered items, specifically, are you seeing show up or not show up. Remember that each number does not get it's own line; some similar items are grouped together (such as all Armor/DR/Force Screen options being on the same line, or all Fuel Used being on a single line) (p.s. if you're using Excel and can give me an example ship from the ones saved that would be useful).
|
I'm using Open Office. Here's the BBCode output (slightly tweaked) of an SM+5 Gypsy Caravan.
Quote:
CARAVAN CLASS PINNACE
PILOTING/TL10 (HIGH-PERFORMANCE SPACECRAFT) or PILOTING/TL10 (AEROSPACE)
Code:
TL Spacecraft dST/dHP Hnd/SR HT Move LWt. Load SM Occ dDR Range Cost
10^ Caravan Class Pinnace 20 -1/4 13 0.166667G/c 30 3.2 [1] +5 5ASV [2,3] 2 [4] — $675.125k
Length: 30 yd. (90 ft.) Lift: 3.33333Gs Crush Depth: 333 ft.
Small Power Points: +2 / -2
Space Performance: sAccel: 0.166667Gs
Air Performance: aAccel: 0.166667Gs (3.7 mph/s) aSpeed: 1,000 mph (0.28 mps) Hnd/SR: -1/4
SHIP SYSTEMS
Code:
FRONT | CENTER | REAR
[1-2] Armor - Light Alloy | [1-2] Armor - Light Alloy | [1-2] Armor - Light Alloy
dDR 2 | dDR 2 | dDR 2
[3] Control Room | [3-5] Habitat | [3-5] Habitat
Comm/Sensor: 4 / 1 Station | 0.9 Cabins | 0.9 Cabins
[4-5] Habitat | [6] Smaller SM Systems | [6] Smaller SM Systems
0.6 Cabins | SM+4 | SM+4
[6] Passenger Seating | [a] Habitat | [a!] Contragravity Lifter
2 Seats | 0.1 Cabins | 3.33333Gs Lift
| [b] Cargo Hold | [b!] Reactionless Engine - Standard
| 0.5 Tons | 0.166667Gs [4,6,7]
| [c‡] Power Plant - Fusion Reactor | [c] Habitat
| 2 Power Points / 200 yr Fuel [5] | 0.1 Cabins
| [core] Cargo Hold | [core] Engine Room
| 1.5 Tons | 1 Workspace
Design Switches, Features, & Notes: 1 Airlock (Capacity: 1 Person), Food Supplies: $250
CAMPAIGN OPTIONS: Reactionless Engine (Drive Field)
SHIP OPTIONS: Streamlined, Artificial Gravity
[1] Load includes: 0.7*tons of Crew & Passengers, 0.25*tons of Standard Food (125*man-days), 2*tons of Cargo Hold
[2] Plus 2 in Passenger Seats, [3] Crew Requirement: 1 Control Stations, 1 Workspaces, 1 Passenger Care
[4] Plus dDR 20 Drive Field
HABITATS
Code:
Qty. Location Type Notes
1 Front Cabin: Cramped 1 person
2 Front Steerage Cargo: Partial 0.5 tons
1 Center Passenger Cabin 2 person
1 Rear Passenger Cabin 2 person
Created using GURPS Spaceship Design Spreadsheet. GURPS Spaceships Design Spreadsheet is copyright © 2009-2012 Eric B. Smith. This spreadsheet is based on information contained in the GURPS Spaceships series of books.
|
Notes 5, 6 and 7 were referenced in the system descriptions but were not described in the
Design Switches, Features, & Notes section.
Also note that I had to use 3 SM+5 plus 1 SM+4 Habitats to fit a full cabin in each of the Center and Rear hull sections. According to SS7 p5.
Quote:
|
A system that’s one SM larger occupies three times its usual number of locations, and has the statistics of a system for a larger ship.
|
Could you add a switch that can consolidate three consecutive identical systems in the same hull section into a one SM larger version?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbsmith
5)<tr> is missing, I can fix that. I think it's only missing in the top table - do you see anywhere else I missed something like that?
|
The closing tag for
<th> cells should not be
</td>. Also, there was no
<h1> page header with the name of the craft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericbsmith
While NOWRAP is not needed in most cells, it is needed for some of the cells. And I didn't want to make the coding any more difficult by having to test whether it is necessary for all of them or not so I just used NOWRAP in all cells. HTML doesn't care about superfluous tags like that, and frankly I'm not too worried about them so long as it's properly formatted.
|
Perhaps you could insert a small style sheet at the top of the code describing all the element styles instead of using formatting attributes in the element tags.
Dalton "Yes, I'm an HTML geek" Spence