|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
I suppose Delusion (The Prime Directive is a virtue and not a complete abdication of ethical responsibility with a side of paternalism and preventing non-citizens from seeking redress when abused by our people) could count as a setting specific racial disadvantage for humans and other Starfleet characters, but it's actually sort of a base assumption of the setting that this is true, so you lose the ST feel if you play up it being a Delusion. A number of other common ones fall into that same category of being non-disadvantages because they are true by the setting rules - Intolerance (Machine intelligences) for example could be a disadvantage in some settings, but in ST isn't because machine intelligences are always villains. I guess characters could have beliefs that opposed one of the implicit setting truths - The prime directive is abusive, machine intelligence is a good idea, psionics are inherently evil, The Federation is imperialist, the Klingon government needs to stamp out this stupid cult of warrior honor, Vulcans are right and humans should adopt non-emotion, wealth discrepencies are perfectly fair, (non-new age) religion makes sense - as valid disadvantages, but in the canon material anyway having one of those pretty much automatically makes you a villain.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| quirks, star trek |
|
|