Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > Transhuman Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2012, 11:06 PM   #11
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: BattleTech in TS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crakkerjakk View Post
Dome Teams!

I can't wait for the Robinson City Reaver to wax that goddamn Shanghai Shanker!
The Portland Pummeler may be a 3:1 long shot, but the operator is a true veteran. I hear they upgraded the fist coating to diamondoid. But you didn't hear it from me, ok?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 05:46 AM   #12
RogerBW
 
RogerBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
Default Re: BattleTech in TS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tzeentch View Post
-- Sounds cool. I don't know why they would use fusion plants vs. cheap batteries though?
Because the original game rules say so, and because one can. The point of the exercise is not to build a viable combat machine, it's to build a BattleMech.

(I imagine that some of the wackier players still regard their walking targets as "real" war machines, just as some of the wackier paintballers and airsofties I've met reckon they have acquired real soldiering skills.)

I note that BT's aerospace fighters and dropships - with a drive specific impulse greater than lightspeed - are well out of even TL10's reach.
RogerBW is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:53 PM   #13
Tzeentch
 
Tzeentch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: BattleTech in TS

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerBW View Post
Because the original game rules say so, and because one can. The point of the exercise is not to build a viable combat machine, it's to build a BattleMech.
-- That alone isn't very interesting though. It would be FARRRRRRRR easier to just use BattleTech and then drape some THS trappings around that (it's in a simulated massive multiplayer online game, or they are real robots with the BattleTech wierdness imposed by outside agencies).

-- That is, I think it's a waste of time and effort to port the BattleTech concept if you are not going to tweak it for a different setting. If you want BattleTech just use BattleTech and swap out of that "minigame" back to THS on the fly.
Tzeentch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 05:33 PM   #14
RogerBW
 
RogerBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
Default Re: BattleTech in TS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tzeentch View Post
-- That alone isn't very interesting though. It would be FARRRRRRRR easier to just use BattleTech and then drape some THS trappings around that (it's in a simulated massive multiplayer online game, or they are real robots with the BattleTech wierdness imposed by outside agencies).
My vision - I'm not saying this is the only or the best one - is that it's a fad among Martian millionaires, who want their giant robots to be "authentic" to the BattleTech game.

Things that PCs might get involved with, off the top of my head:
  • Someone with good reflexes and military experience is needed to pilot the 'Mech.
  • Someone's winning too many fights. Is he cheating? How?
  • A real dangerous thing is happening, and the only hardware available to deal with it is the 'Mechs. Which aren't military-grade by any stretch of the imagination, but are still big robots with a lot of lifting ability.
RogerBW is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
battletech

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.