Discarding Cards

[Clipper]

Originally Posted by MunchkinMan

If you're going to quote me, then point out an issue with further, unquoted, information in the post quoted, how about providing a link so that I can go back and look at it and see where the disconnect is coming from and when the post was written. It's more than a little unfair to hold me to a FAQ entry that might not have even been written yet, and it's never a good idea to quote out of context. I've seen enough people do that here and take something so out of context in order to prove that night is day. In this case, it seems, without the question, the answer might not mean what you think it means.

Sorry mate, I certainly didn't mean to cause offence and I did think I had provided enough information to find the other post for reference. I thought the link that I did provide in the quote itself (the blue arrow) was enough to find the other one as it was only three posts later in the same thread, but here's that post too, including its link as well:

Originally Posted by MunchkinMan

Why? And why does this come as a surprise? "Permanently" means things like Poisoned, Cheat, or Blessed (wrt Items) or Dark or Master (wrt Races and Classes). If we're talking about Fu, and we're talking about all those Items that are multi-layer Armor, that's just being worn together, not a permanent attachment. I think the Knight Light, too, could be discarded separately.

You said then that the class and race enhancers are permanently attached and in the other post that permanently attached cards are always discarded with cards they are attached to.

And for completeness, the FAQ question is:

Q. When can I play (or discard) Master, Dark, or High cards?
A. They can be played (or discarded) at at any time you would play (or discard) a Class or Race card.

Which heavily implies it's OK to discard an enhancer without discarding the card it is attached to.

And again, no offence meant and I don't blame you in any way for the discrepancy. I assume the FAQ was newer and hence overrides the older decision, but just wanted to point it out for an official clarification if anybody else followed my link in future and then also noticed that issue.