|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
|
Quote:
Anyone can realistically be at least decent at plucking out another person's eyes given a few minutes or so, in such a way as to prevent eye damage, on an unconscious or paralyzed opponent. No special technique or advantage required. Surgical skill or technique might improve the odds of doing it without more harm than necessary to the victim, and to ensure the eye remains okay. If a human character began play as a human that had lost their eyes prior to the campaign, and started play with a set of bionic eyes (as in a sci-fi setting), I would argue they could take Gadget limitations on them. What's the difference here? They're parts that confer special abilities, can be removed, and then used by the jerk that took them from you. No difference between sci-fi bionic super-eyes and this Naruto concept. I would also argue for technical reasons that Vision-Based is not a perfect fit here. It's technically possible to have IT:No Eyes, which means you either don't have eyes, or your eyes are not required for vision. Someone with that advantage might be able to see somehow without eyes, but need their existing Byakugan eyes to access these chakra abilities. They could also have an Extra Head, one with normal eyes, one with Byakugan eyes. Again, in either case, just Vision-Based would allow such characters to retain their special abilities, by RAW, even if they ended up losing their Byakugan eyes (through destruction or theft). Obviously, I wouldn't allow normal eyes to be considered Gadgets, because in RAW the sense of Vision is not an advantage but the lack of a disadvantage. Byakugan eyes and their like are different.
__________________
-JC |
|
|
|
|
|
|