Raincoat and Transferal Potion

[Eben]

Yes to first scenario. Raincoat protects against potions played in combat, transferral happened before that players combat.

No to second. A and B already in combat together.

[Demosthenes]

Originally Posted by Eben

Yes to first scenario. Raincoat protects against potions played in combat, transferral happened before that players combat.

No to second. A and B already in combat together.

Actually, raincoat says (and I could be wrong, but this is what I recall from the discussion): "other players cannot use potions to interfere with your combats".

The question being whether causing a combat is interfering with your combats, which could potentially include the state of not being in combat. I.E. Player C's combats are 0 currently, transferal potion increases his combats to 1 thereby interfering with his combats.

[MunchkinMan]

The player wearing the Raincoat was not the player hit with the potion. That the combat can then be transferred to him is not affected by the Raincoat.

[Demosthenes]

Originally Posted by MunchkinMan

The player wearing the Raincoat was not the player hit with the potion. That the combat can then be transferred to him is not affected by the Raincoat.

Thank you for answering my question.

To be certain I'm not mistaken, this is what I take from your statement: Transferal Potion is being played upon the player(s) currently in combat; not the player combat is being transferred to, nor the monster(s).

Thanks again.