|
|
|
#21 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
|
But only the sensors and manoeuvring drives (the parts that do the actual work) would be big enough to see without a microscope. All the rest would be so small that it could be placed anywhere. Dedicating a whole room to it seems ludicrous.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer. ˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
... I think the term is non sequitur.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
It's 1/20 the weight of the craft. If you skimp down to a small system, which is perfectly reasonable for many craft, it's only about 1/60 the mass of the full vessel. The presence or absence of a physical "room" is irrelevant.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, Canada
|
Quote:
I do agree that the name is misleading. Control SYSTEM might be better than Control ROOM. The control Room is an OPTIONAL subset of the control System.
__________________
FYI: Laser burns HURT! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| drop pod, soft landing, spaceships |
|
|