|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
If it consists of narrow plates joined together so that they can flex a little then it is segmented plate. Most foot armour would be segmented rather than solid plate. Same with abdomen armour. Gauntlets could be either: GURPS doesn't separate out fingers and hands. With a gauntlet the fingers were segmented but the hand itself was often solid but some examples are segmented all the way to the wrist.
Lorica segmentata is a crude verson of segmented plate for the torso. Late medieval "anima" armour is a more advanced version. http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=17839 There is no "chain" armour in Low-Tech Last edited by DanHoward; 10-22-2011 at 03:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Quote:
In my games, I changed to Early Plate and Plate, so, Plate made at TL3- is early plate, and plate made at TL4+ is plate. This way, a player can have Anima armor if he wants, the weight and cost is the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Remember that Lorica Segmentata is cheap segmented plate.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cumberland, ME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
They could but it doesn't seem like they did. There isn't a single depiction anywhere of a Roman officer wearing segmentata. If they had the means then they wear mail or scale or a breastplate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Caxias do Sul, Brazil
|
Probably because hamata is best than segmentata, the advantage of segmentata is how easy it is to produce.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| armor, low-tech, low-tech armor |
|
|