|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
No, but a superior aerospace force + a regular navy is another matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
According to Wikipedia, only 9 countries on Earth currently have aircraft carriers at all, and most don't have more than one in current commission.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Quote:
That being said, I'm not sure maintaining many oceanic paths under control is a priority for a faction that has primarily air-based both in terms of combat and logistics vehicles. Island-based aircraft should suffice to safeguard the naval paths between the islands, the local fishing operations etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | ||
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's probably not impossible for their rivals to conduct naval-based interdiction of airlanes, for that matter. I'd be inclined to invest in some submarines with SAMs.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | ||
|
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Quote:
Quote:
Doesn't that basically require already having achieved regional dominance in the first place? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Carrier Battle Groups
Quote:
If it is, their airforce probably could have unlimited endurance with airborne carriers. If it isn't, I'm wondering how this can be economically viable. I don't see why. It's commerce raiding made slightly more inconvenient because the commerce you're trying to raid is relatively fast-moving.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | ||
|
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Quote:
Quote:
I still don't get it: you're saying that an 'average' enemy navy would be enough to seriously try to threaten the Khæn's local naval commerce, which is protected by both the local 'average' navy and a local 'superior' airforce? While having a stretched logistics trail? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
Quote:
At least when you're dealing in bulk, which you will be, when it comes to fuel and ordnance.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Quote:
However, there has been no point in recent history, possibly in history at all where civilian trade didn't make heavy use of water transport as the cheapest of all bulk transport methods. (I have no clue why Mass Combat sea logistics cost more than land logistics.) Contragrav might be able to upset that, though. "Unable to import or export heavy goods at reasonable prices" is not an economic niche I can believe. Quote:
Do they not engage in long distance trade? As a nation in a TL9+ world? That's very hard to credit. If your Khæn have no commerce outside easy air patrol range of their land bases that might protect them from raiding, but it's unbelievable. Also, naval forces don't so much require a 'logistics trail' as such. They can have one, but they also have internal range and stores to allow them to cruise for long distances and timeframes. A modern SSN (nuclear submarine) can circumnavigate the globe without surfacing, never mind resupplying. Operating far from logistics limits how much they can do before withdrawing for resupply, but when each SAM brings down an airliner or cargo plane and a handful of shells or a torpedo destroys a surface freighter that limit is more than enough to be intolerable.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| mass combat, worldbuilding |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|