|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
The Romans still managed to set a standard for hygene that wouldn't be equalled for ~1500 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
-- It could be argued that was in spite of their particular bathing practices (e.g. the sick and infirm used the baths first).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
As opposed to: "I take a bath once per year, whether I need it or not." -- Elizabeth I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
I may need to look into this a little more but from what I understand it's somewhat over stated how dirty people of the middle ages were, especailly given the tendancy of people in the victorian period to portray the periods that came before as savage and uncivilised.
__________________
There is no "i" in team, but there is in Dangerious! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Bathouses --and other practices associated with them-- were certainly not unknown during the middle ages: http://www.gallowglass.org/jadwiga/p...thkeepers.html Additionally, there are quite a few accounts of people drowning while bathing in rivers or streams, or doing the laundry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Quote:
I saw him once as a kid. My parents actually went out to Ballarat and had a meal with the man.
__________________
...().0...0() .../..........\ -/......O.....\- ...VVVVVVV ..^^^^^^^ A clock running two hours slow has the correct time zero times a day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Torino, Italy
|
Quote:
For example, it sounds strange that people living in hot, wet climates would not bath themselves in rivers, lakes and the like. Why wouldn't they? If it's hot, bathing or at least "splashing" oneself with fresh, unheated water is not displeasing at all. If only to remove some of the dirt and sweat. The same goes for coastal and river populations - if you are a fisherman or a rice farmer (or even just if you do the laundry at the river^^) you are pretty much forced to bathe and to let your clothes dry... (even if you are not a good swimmer). Even many dogs and other non-acquatic animals like to swim and "bathe" as soon as they have a chance to do so. Little children loves to bathe. Why low-tech humans should be so dirt-loving? The following (unsourced) websites argue that people in the Middle Ages bathed more than we think, and more than "their descendants up to the 19th century": http://www.triviumpublishing.com/art...iddleages.html http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_did_pe...in_middle_ages http://www.medieval-life.net/bathing.htm The last one argues that "as the forests were depleted, firewood became expensive and the rising costs of heating the water forced most of the bathhouses to close. (...) By the mid-1300s, only the very wealthy could afford firewood for hot water in the winter. The rest of the population was forced to be dirty most of the time." (Note that the mid-1300s is the very end of the Middle Ages; the last century of a millennium-long era. And that many, if not most, countries do not have any appreciable "winter", think about the southern mediterranean, West Asia, North Africa, India, Southeast Asia...) Wikipedia has a section on the Western history of Bathing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathing#Western_history It lists a few "practical" and ethical issues which made bathing less and less common just after the Middle Ages. The wikianswers site, above, says that "The Danes are described as generally bathing once a week; the Anglo-Saxons less often." If I were a Dane in the middle age, in freezing climate with no hot water easily available, I really doubt I would bathe more than once a week. Actually I'd say that someone who bathed once a week in that conditions, was quite brave and/or really into personal hygiene. So perhaps the oppositon to bathing was typical of Anglo-saxons in certain times, and it has been popularized as "universal of everybody in the middle ages" because of the worldwide influence of Anglo-saxon culture... Just as the modern image of fantasy is largely shaped on British middle-age, and most westerners if you say "middle age" will think about Robin Hood and green forests rather than, say, Italian Comuni or Moorish Spain... But that's just a conjecture on my part, if somebody knows more about history of bathing across different countries and ages (and about the hygiene practices of modern low-tech societies populations), I am ready to be corrected.
__________________
Last edited by Lupo; 01-13-2011 at 07:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
There's also a difference between cleaning yourself and bathing. It's entirely possible to clean yourself without immersing yourself in water, or even significantly taking your clothes off (should nudity be an issue due to climate or religious/cultural reasons).
Sponge baths don't require nearly as much water to be heated, nor carted around. I'm a huge fan of long hot baths for various reasons, but even while camping I've managed to wash up myself "acceptably" with just a billy can of water - that's about a litre (or a quart). I still wanted a bath when I got home, but it's hard to shake me of that habit.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
|
Quote:
As for bathing Danes in Denmark (which is not directly situated in the Gulf Stream), I imagine they had communal baths, each large farm stead having some kind of bathing annex (a separate building would mean more heat loss), with tubs, or else a steam house of some kind. Bathing indoors depends on available firewood (wood also being needed to build ships, to maintain the all-important tradition of violent tourism), rather than on how cold it is outside. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| hygiene, low-tech, roman |
|
|