Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2011, 02:15 PM   #1
DemiBenson
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Boston, Hub of the Universe!
Default [LT] Shoes and Boots

Low-Tech says shoes are "DR 1. $40, 2 lbs." and boots are " DR 2. $80, 3 lbs."

But if you try to recreate shoes and boots using the armor rules, they don't come out right - they're generally too light and too cheap and/or not sturdy enough. Maybe the DR values are for the underside only, and the rest is non-armoring light leather, but then they still come out too light and cheap.

I was trying to recreate an outfit to match this image of a conquistador with the (apparently) leather knee-boots. The boots are clearly functional (riding, walking), but probably also provide some protection to the shins and knees, being used somewhat like chaps to protect against light brush.

So, how to stat them up? What little house rule would make things line up?
__________________
Demi Benson
DemiBenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2011, 02:22 PM   #2
Bruno
 
Bruno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

There's errata, most if not all of the clothing needs to have twice the listed weights.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table
A Wiki for my F2F Group
A neglected GURPS blog
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 04:35 AM   #3
Lupo
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Torino, Italy
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruno View Post
There's errata, most if not all of the clothing needs to have twice the listed weights.
Really? So leather boots should actually weigh 6 lbs?

In any case, boots will still be significantly inferior to comparable "feet armor" built using the table.

E.g. Layered medium leather for RD 3 to the feet is $22, 2.6 lbs.
For RD 2 it's $12, 1.5lbs.

I actually thought that these weights and costs were meant to replace the Boots from the Basic set... I don't think many PC will spend $80 to get RD2 boots which weighs 3 or 6 lbs, when for $60 and 2.8lbs you can have Heavy Layered Cloth "boots" which grant RD 4. Or you can buy sollerets for $90 which grant the same RD and weigh only 2.4 lbs... (segmented plate).
I don't think boots should be heavier than sollerets.

Or perhaps, foot armor is just armor, e.g. it protects the upper side of your feet, but you still need proper shoes/boots to walk comfortably? E.g. you need to pay the cost and weight of boots in addition to those of feet armor?

This should be made clear because boots are quite significant on a character's Encumbrance.
__________________
Lupo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:12 AM   #4
Trachmyr
 
Trachmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Clothing weights need to be doubled but not shoe weights... in fact clothing weights are not suppose to include the weight of shoes despite what it says in LT.

When I build shoes, I add 1 or 2 DR to 50% of the foot to represent the sole... boots can also include some coverage for the shin. But even then the area % for feet is a bit small (it has the same % as hands), and probably should be increased to 15-20%.
Trachmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 10:04 AM   #5
Icelander
 
Icelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by ectropy View Post
Low-Tech says shoes are "DR 1. $40, 2 lbs." and boots are " DR 2. $80, 3 lbs."

But if you try to recreate shoes and boots using the armor rules, they don't come out right - they're generally too light and too cheap and/or not sturdy enough. Maybe the DR values are for the underside only, and the rest is non-armoring light leather, but then they still come out too light and cheap.

I was trying to recreate an outfit to match this image of a conquistador with the (apparently) leather knee-boots. The boots are clearly functional (riding, walking), but probably also provide some protection to the shins and knees, being used somewhat like chaps to protect against light brush.

So, how to stat them up? What little house rule would make things line up?
Well, protection from light brush sounds like Light Leather, which gives DR 1 against Cut (which ought to apply to surface abrasions, in my opinion).

I can't find a weight for Light Leather and I think that the clothing examples that have DR are supposed to be somewhere between Light Leather and Medium Leather, giving DR 1 against everything.

If Light Leather is listed, but not given a weight, that ought to be errata. If the weight is not listed on the table and not in the text where Light Leather is given stats, that's not good organisation.

The argument that Light Leather doesn't make for good armour is irrelevant. Someone might desire to stat up a full-body suit of light leather for a fetishist at Low-Tech. Or any number of other uses.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela!
Icelander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 10:08 AM   #6
Icelander
 
Icelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

As for Shoes and Boots specifically, what's the problem?

Shoes protect 10% of the body and thus would weight even less than 2 lbs. using the armour design system. Most of it seems to be support for the foot and suchlike.

Boots provide minimal protection for the lower leg, but it's not noted how much. If it's about as much material as for the Foot, the weight fits if you use Layered Leather, Light.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela!
Icelander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 03:22 PM   #7
DanHoward
 
DanHoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Low-Tech clothing had to remain consistent with the clothing in High-Tech. That's why there is a DR inconsistency. If High-Tech was rewriten then all leather clothing/protective gear will be treated as light leather and get DR 1 vs cut only, which, I agree would include most light damage including abrasions etc.
DanHoward is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 05:28 PM   #8
Lupo
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Torino, Italy
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHoward View Post
Low-Tech clothing had to remain consistent with the clothing in High-Tech. That's why there is a DR inconsistency. If High-Tech was rewriten then all leather clothing/protective gear will be treated as light leather and get DR 1 vs cut only, which, I agree would include most light damage including abrasions etc.
I think you could make good money by writing and selling a book titled
"How Low Tech was actually supposed to be, if not for consistancy and pagecount concerns"
__________________
Lupo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 06:19 PM   #9
Icelander
 
Icelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHoward View Post
Low-Tech clothing had to remain consistent with the clothing in High-Tech. That's why there is a DR inconsistency. If High-Tech was rewriten then all leather clothing/protective gear will be treated as light leather and get DR 1 vs cut only, which, I agree would include most light damage including abrasions etc.
But what's the weight for Light Leather?

If we want to design custom clothing made from it, one that happens to protect from abrasions, it would be nice to have a base weight to plug into the percentages of the body in the armour section.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela!
Icelander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 12:26 AM   #10
Trachmyr
 
Trachmyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
Default Re: [LT] Shoes and Boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander View Post
But what's the weight for Light Leather?

If we want to design custom clothing made from it, one that happens to protect from abrasions, it would be nice to have a base weight to plug into the percentages of the body in the armour section.
I've asked this before, and the response has always been something on the order of "Light Leather is not armor so it does not need a table entry". Really Frusterating! Ok, so it's not on the table... but how about pitching a weight to us anyways! I would think they had to have one to base other items on.

Trying to reverse engineer the weight, light leather is supposed to be equivalent to Heavy Clothing (they both can get DR1 vs. cut only). Heavy Clothing is supposed to be 8 pounds (sans footwear).... but that's for a full set. Assuming that heavy clothing is supposed to cover Torso, Legs, Arms... that yelds 8/2.5... which gives an ugly number. Round down to 3 pounds, this seems fair is you assume that heavy clothing also includes light gloves, a scarf and some kind of light cap.

As for cost, you'll have to adopt a feel good number... as Heavy Clothing cost is based on Cost of Living. If you took 30% of cost of living for status 0, then divided by 2.5 (or 2.666), you'll arrive at $67.5-$72. However, the cost of Heavy Clothing is supposed to include the cost of footwear and accessories. If one just assumes boots, then ((30% of CoL forstatus 0 - $80)/2.666) = $37.5. One could also base it on Status -1 and gain a dollar figure equal to 1/2 or less of these amounts. Personally I set it at $30 for any Leather or Cloth that gives DR1 vs. Cut only.


As a side note, for leather that gives DR 1 (-1 vs. Impaling), I set the numbers at $40 & 6lbs.
Trachmyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
armor, low-tech

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.