|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
Quote:
In any event, if the stats for cranequins are not a deliberate nod to some new scholarship challenging Payne-Gallwey's work and of which I was unaware, they are simply not accurate. All authorities I have read agree that cranequins were heavier than the weights given in Low-Tech and while historians unaccountably neglect to give GURPS $ Costs, it may be safely said that cranequins are more expensive to construct than windlasses.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
Quote:
In addition, replicas have been made of many of the cranequins that Payne-Gallwey describes and these weight between 3-6 lbs. Blackmore's 'Hunting Weapons from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century', also cited in playtest comments, has the same 3-6 lbs. weight range.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! Last edited by Icelander; 11-18-2010 at 05:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| ccoi, crossbows, low-tech |
|
|