|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
I was wondering about something. If there has been a thread on this already, a link would be appreciated.
What is a good rule of thumb for the relative DR values for the components of historical field plate harnesses? I understand the thickness of armor tended to vary from the extremities to the chest and head, but don't know enough to say what a typical ratio might be. Or, for that matter, how the ratios might vary between different styles of armor. For example, if the breastplate is DR 7, what are likely values for the arms, back, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I imagine that someone will come back to you with some very detailed variances; but ultimately this is what the 'targeting chinks in armor' rule is for.
Armor is thinner in <position X>, targeting <position X> to make use of that thinner armor in the form of better penetration is done at -10. Making it more complicated then that, at least in my mind, would seem an exercise in tedium- so my rule of thumb is 'use the rules as written, but DO have my enemies remember that they can target chinks if the first blow gets absorbed for no damage' |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
What I mean is, what are likely DR values for different parts of the body, using the Low-Tech rules? Like, “If the breastplate has DR x, then the DR of the arms would range from y to z.” Or, “The gauntlets would likely have 2/3 the DR of the breastplate, but not if it is Gothic.” Stuff like that. The chinks rules are a different issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
The head and chest was usually covered in the heaviest plate. Followed by the back, abdomen, shoulders and upper arms. The lightest plate was on the legs, hands, and feet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
So a suit of armor might be
DR 9 head, chest DR 6 back, abdomen, arms (Im not sure where shoulders fit) DR 3 hands, legs, feet ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
Quote:
Here is a more specific question. If I stat out a suit with a DR 7 breastplate and bascinet, DR 4 gauntlets, sollerets, and legs, and the other parts all DR 6 or 5, would it be reasonable to treat it as a typical harness for NPCs to wear? Or would it be unusual for the DR values to vary that much from chest to legs/hands? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Where? When? For whom? It would be very unusual for Plains Indians c. 1790, not so much for some European Calvary c. 1600. For the Skull Legions of the Dread Citadel c. The Year of The Death Snail? Who is to say?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| armor, low-tech |
|
|