|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Is it legal (RAW) to use All-Out Defense (Increased Defense +2) to boost a Riposte attempt?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Sounds fine to me, really.
Instead of taking an AoD: +2, you could just Evaluate for the turn and get a bonus on your attack without having to wait for someone to attack you.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
The intent was to increase the likelihood of a successful parry before the riposte, as a tactic for penetrating the defenses of an opponent with a higher skill level.
I'm assuming that it's also legal to use the bonus to hit from Evaluate with a Deceptive Attack, also? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
I'd say yes, since Deceptive Attack says 'final effective skill' not quantifying that before other modifiers like Riposte.
However, Riposte and Deceptive Attack aren't cumulative... Riposte is a specialized Deceptive Attack that tanks your defense instead of attack roll. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
Those modifiers do, though, make it more likely that you succeed at your penalized defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Well, as an example: A character has a skill level in Karate of 18, with combat reflexes, and enhanced parry 1. His "normal" parry is 14. However, for the purposes of Riposte, his combat reflexes bonus is not taken into account until the negative modifier is applied, in this case he could take a maximum of a -5 penalty, reducing his parry score to 8. His final parry score, however, would be 9, after the +1 from Combat Reflexes. Had he taken an All-Out Defense the previous turn, would that then increase his parry to 11?
He could take a Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
The rules don't say you can't do it, but as written, there seems to be some intent to make the tactic's rewards match its risk of failure. I didn't want to add in bonuses that make it more likely to succeed if that was not the rule's original intent. As it works out though, giving up an attack from a previous turn in order to setup a later attack seems to be a decent balancing factor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| all-out defense, martial arts, riposte |
|
|