DF 11: No Love For Humans?

[Anders]

It's somewhat unfair that all other races get cool Power-Ups and humans don't. At least I think so, and that's all I care about, really. Has anyone else thought about this?


Traditionally, one of the things humans have going for them is that they are versatile. They can be anything! This doesn't help in a game where there are races that are better at almost any specific thing, however. Human versatility needs a boost. Would you allow this?

Versatile

1 point

This allows you to buy one level in a talent outside your normal template. For example, a Barbarian could pick up Ninja Talent 1 or a Thief could Born War-Leader without spending the 50 points necessary to buy a Lens. You must specialize - each Talent is its own Perk!

[Stone Dog]

I'd let humans do that for free, but I can see where spending a point would be appropriate.

Don't Inkeepers have something similar, though?

Subtler bonuses can also work out. If the campaign world really is humanocentric then medical penalties could apply. Giving all non humans without a social stigma "Minority Group" could help a bit too.

[Anders]

I'm also considering only letting humans stray from their path - feel free to be an Elf Wizard, but not an Elf Wizard-Barbarian...

[smurf]

Puny human!

My Sci Fi campaign takes that attitude but with more indifference.

I thought that the fantasy races cost X just to be that race. Humans are already ahead in turns of all points are used for whatever.

Then there are some advantages you/we/I may disagree with for fantasy races too. Which means it has to be altered.

[Anders]

While that is technically true, it's not cool. The problem is that the others have access to all the shiny stuff humans get, while the reverse is not true.

[Kromm]

Note that nobody gets anything for free here. You make a 250-point character, and if you want to be a nonhuman, you have to figure out where to find up to 75 points for your racial template. That comes out of points on your professional template. This means that humans have more template-specific stuff where nonhumans have racial templates . . . which means that humans know more spells, have more abilities in their powers, and can start out with more professional power-ups allowed at character creation. That is, they're better at their niche.

Still, if you feel that humans should get something special, go ahead and give them something! Since I really loathe old-school class-race restrictions – whether you word them as "humans are more versatile" or "halflings can't be martial artists" – I wouldn't mess with that side of things in any canonical publication. Probably the simplest move would be to say that humans can spend earned points freely to add or improve Luck (from Luck, through Extraordinary Luck, to Ridiculous Luck) and Serendipity, regardless of what the templates, lenses, and power-ups for their profession indicate. This explains why humans seem to be the dominant race, despite their lack of bodily weaponry, innate talents, etc. If that still doesn't seem cool enough, tack on other Luck-related traits, allowing humans to acquire Daredevil retroactively, buy Destiny, etc.

[Fnugus]

Originally Posted by Asta Kask

Traditionally, one of the things humans have going for them is that they are versatile. They can be anything! This doesn't help in a game where there are races that are better at almost any specific thing, however. Human versatility needs a boost. Would you allow this?

In my fantasy campaign I wrote up racial templates for all available races, including human, and required my players to pick a template. The human template would include things such as Common Sense, Dyslexia, a bonus to ST, and a penalty to IQ (to reflect more or less a standard, TL3, european peasant), balanced out so the human template would cost 0 points anyway, so the players wouldn't feel that points were "stolen" from them if they didn't wish to spend points on racial templates.