|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
World Traveler in Training
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I need to finish the bio, but I thought I'd post this design preliminarily to get any feedback anyone wants to give.
Body +4, heavy frame, standard materials with standard tracks and limited rotation open mount. Improved brakes, improved suspension, waterproof. Armor: DR 50 overall; 60 degree slope in front for DR 100 and 30 degree slope for DR 75 in rear. Spall liner. Improved tracked drivetrain with 205-kW improved turbocharged diesel engine. 95 gallon self-sealing standard tanks. Truck Lead-Acid battery pack (8,000 kWs). M2HB MG with 1,000 rounds. Short Range radio with Scrambler, Compact Fire Suppression system, Environ Control for 13, Military GPS, 2 NCS, 11 NPS. The design runs 3% light at this point.
__________________
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -- Kierkegaard http://aerodrome.hamish.tripod.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
I'm guessing your designing that with Vehicles for GURPS third edition? Why not just stat it out from the actual statistics, rather than designing it in Vehicles?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
World Traveler in Training
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
And actually, I was wondering about my stats for DR anyways--which are derived from real-world armor sources.
__________________
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -- Kierkegaard http://aerodrome.hamish.tripod.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cheers HANS
__________________
I blog at Shooting Dice. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
World Traveler in Training
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Gun traverse noted.
The armor DRs are more what I was looking for. I finally found values of 3.8 cm FTB, 3.18-4.45cm RL, and 3.18cm U. However, multiplying mm by 2.8 as in Vehicles Lite, I was getting DRs of 75-100. Seemed excessive for a lightly armored APC. What is your conversion?? The gas tanks are mounted on the outside of the APC; figured self-sealing would be in order, although that is an assumption of mine. Knew there were 4 batteries; thanks for the kWs. And I'll call it just a plain old Fire Extinguisher, then. I'll use stats from Robots. I think I need to find some better sourcebooks to start from. Thank you very much for the input--it's just what I was hoping for!!
__________________
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -- Kierkegaard http://aerodrome.hamish.tripod.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cheers HANS
__________________
I blog at Shooting Dice. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
World Traveler in Training
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
|
Quote:
Where is the rule for aluminum vs. steel DR? I dropped the self-seal tanks and found a source that listed IR (seems likely in today's battlefield). I decided to go for a Cheap structure to beef up loaded weight; otherwise the design was off by more like 18%. Besides, what army doesn't go for Cheap? Again, thanks for all the help, Hans.
__________________
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -- Kierkegaard http://aerodrome.hamish.tripod.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Quote:
Edit: Ich hast been der NINJA'D!! (Eurotrip: "I speak bad German.")
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
World Traveler in Training
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
|
M113A3 APC
Developed in the late 1950s, the M113 was one of the first "battle taxis" to enter service with the U.S. armed forces. Made primarily of airplane grade aluminum rather than steel, the vehicle is very light for its size, allowing it to be air transportable, air droppable and swimmable. Its utility rapidly turned it into the foundation for a much larger family of vehicles, such as the M577 and M106. The M113 carries 11 soldiers in bench seating along the inner sides of the vehicle, with a commander sitting in the middle of the APC and the driver in the front left. The M113A2 has seen action in Vietnam (where the Viet Cong called it the "Green Dragon") and Desert Storm. In Desert Storm, it was decided that the A2 was underpowered and unable to keep up with the Abrams tank, leading to the addition of the RISE package in 1987. This upgraded the diesel engine to a turbocharged version, improved driver controls, moved the fuel tanks to the exterior of the vehicle and added a composite spall liner. The M113A3 has provisions for mounting 14.5mm of external steel armor (DR 40), and by 2006 is expected to feature high speed digital networks and data transfer systems. The M113A3 is in service in over 50 countries. Over 28,000 A3s are currently in service, and total production of the M113 line exceeds 80,000 vehicles. It has a clearance of 16", can climb obstacles 24" tall, a cruising speed of 3.6 mph in water, and a cruising range of 300 miles. The M113A3 burns 7.2 gallons of diesel per hour. Visibility is poor. Subassemblies: Body +4, Tracks +3, full rotation Open Mount +0. Powertrain: 205-kW Improved Tracked drivetrain with 205-kW Improved Diesel turbocharged engine, four 4,320-kWs lead acid batteries. Fuel: 95 gallons diesel (Fire 9). Occupancy: 2 NCS, 11 NPS Cargo: 0 cf. Armor F RL B T U Body: 6/70 4/35 4/50 3/10 3/10 Tracks: 4/35 4/35 4/35 4/35 4/35 Weaponry: 12.7mm Machine Gun/M2HB (2,000 rounds Solid). Equipment: Body: Spall liner, short-range (3-mile) radio with scrambler, two fire extinguishers, military GPS, passive IR (3-mile), periscope, 13-person environmental control. Statistics: Size: 16'x8.8'x7.2' Payload: 1.65 tons Lwt.: 13.6 tons Volume: 882 cf. Maint.: 43 hours Price: $214,961 HT: 12. HPs: 1,200 Body, 430 each Track. gSpeed: 41 gAccel: 3 gDecel: 15 gMR: 0.5 gSR: 7 Ground Pressure Very Low. 4/5 Off-Road speed. Design Notes: Body is 550 cf; tracks are 330 cf; open mount is 2 cf. Structure is Heavy, Cheap. It has Improved Brakes (an exception to the Wheeled only rule), Improved Suspension and is Waterproof. Armor is expensive metal with 60-degree slope in the front and 30-degree slope in the rear. Mechanical controls. Empty weight is 23,880 lbs. Design loaded weight was increased 6% to match real-world values. Design gSpeed was 50 mph; the real-world value is shown. One of the fire extinguishers is portable; the other is confined to the engine compartment. Some sources state the M113A3 has an NBC system; this would require the vehicle to be Sealed. Variants: The M113 (1960) featured a 160-kW gasoline engine and 80 gallon fuel tanks. gSpeed 37 mph; cruising range 200 miles. The M113A1 (1964) introduced a 158-kW diesel engine and 95 gallon fuel tanks for improved range. gSpeed 37, range 300 miles. The M113A2 (1979) improved the engine cooling system and suspension. The M113 chassis has been used for a bewildering array of derivatives, including but not limited to the M58 Wolf smoke generator carrier, M106 self-propelled 107mm mortar, M113 AMEV medvac, M125 self-propelled 81mm mortar, M548 cargo carrier, M577 command post carrier, M730 Chaparral guided missile equipment carrier, M901 improved TOW vehicle, M981 fire support team vehicle, M1059 Lynx smoke generator carrier, M1064 self-propelled 120mm mortar, M1068 standard integrated command post system carrier, and M1108 universal carrier.
__________________
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -- Kierkegaard http://aerodrome.hamish.tripod.com Last edited by Phaelen Bleux; 12-01-2009 at 09:59 AM. Reason: typos, Gavin gaff |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Oh, for the love of . . .
No, no, and no. Absolutely freakin noone calls it "Gavin" except for one second lieutenant formerly of the Army who has a grudge against the Marines and just about everything in the US military except for the "Gavin," a mythical vehicle that is the solution to all of America's fighting problems . . . http://home.comcast.net/~genericdad/m113gavin.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M113_ar...sonnel_carrier You might try Tanknet, where active and former tankcrew have devoted pages upon pages debunking this myth. Quote:
Cheers HANS
__________________
I blog at Shooting Dice. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|