|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
|
Astropus template in Biotech pg 91:
The template has Air Move -10 (Air speed 2) [-20] and Flight (costs Fatigue 1FP, -5%; Requires 0G, -50%) [18] It seems wrong to me to have a reduced Air Move that is worth more points than the Flight costs. Shouldn't the Air Move be treated as a limitation on Flight? or have the negative point cost capped at x% of the final cost for Flight? Otherwise you can get as in this case a player getting flight, albeit with limitations, for free Last edited by lachimba; 10-24-2009 at 07:56 PM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Quote:
Reduced Air Move would be worth -10%/level when applied to Flight. You end up with the same cost per reduction (unless using multiplicative modifiers), but you don't end up with a situation where, with all else being equal, a flying character costs less than an earthbound one.
__________________
Quos deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Latin: Those whom a god wishes to destroy, he first drives mad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Quote:
Of course, looking at my example now, I do see a problem with it. I calculated it as though Flight were worth 20 points, rather than 40 points. Putting in zero-G (maybe this is what you meant?), we end up with Flight (Winged, 0G only) [10] and Reduced Air Move -6 [-12]. This means a character that can fly at 4 yards/second in 0G is worth 2 points less than one who cannot. Getting points back for gaining utility, regardless of how limited it may be, doesn't sit well with me.
__________________
Quos deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Latin: Those whom a god wishes to destroy, he first drives mad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County, VA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County, VA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
I think what he meant is it should not have legs. They donīt fit the concept and their absence would solve the problem, since when not flying it could only drag itself along at very low speeds with itīs tentacles. Could probably even be a disadvantage worth more than 2 points...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County, VA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bio-tech, biotech, q&a |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|