|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
|
While continuing to work on my Dixie-7 world, I found myself wanting to go down another rabbit hole and work on putting together an SST airliner - ala the Concorde, Tupolev Tu-144, Boeing 2702, or Lockheed L-2000 - for the DC-25 stratoliner in Dixie-1. However, I'm waffling on HOW to build it.
I've looked around the forums, but haven't found anyone else who has put one together with GURPS Vehicles - or maybe someone has, but has not bothered posting the specs here. I'm thinking the following: -STOL wings -Superior or Excellent streamlining with a lifting body -4 turbo-ramjet engines Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Assuming that you just wanted GURPS 4E stats:
https://gurps.fandom.com/wiki/Vehicl...assenger_Plane I haven't found any GURPS 3E Vehicles-type stats, however, so I can't help with the design process. A fictional SST might come close enough to being a spaceship that you could use GURPS Spaceship design rules. Eric B. Smith has done lots of good work using this system to design non-space craft. Examples are included in the Spaceship Design Spreadsheet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Quote:
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
If you do use Ve2 to make a Concorde you'll have to be up on the afterburners rules. Concorde used 1960s (TL7) fighter jet engines with the afterburners running all the way. If you calculate fuel use that way you'll probably get a ridiculous number but Concorde really did carry that much fuel. That's why it went out of business.
I remember you had said something about turbo-ramjets and that might get around the afterburner problem though the SR-71 gulped fuel too. TL8 technologies generally might be necessary to make this thing more sensible. I'm not sure about STOL wings with a Lifting Body. It makes an odd picture in my mind's eye. It might not be necessary anyway. Ve2 loves lifting bodies.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and some other bits.
|
They are way off because whoever transcribed them to the wiki used the stats for the Douglas DC-3 from the vehicle collection, not the Concorde. Check the actual PDF for more accurate numbers.
__________________
My blog. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto
|
THANK YOU! This seems to be a good starting point to plug in the numbers from.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| concorde, supersonic, tu-144, vehicles 2e |
|
|