|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
So I was reading the be Melee rules pdf and I see that some weapon damage rolls are 1d-4 for a thrown rock. So does that mean if I roll 1-4 on the die the. I do no damage to an unarmored for even though I did hit with the rock or is there a minimum of 1 point of damage if I hit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Columbia, Maryland
|
I've been assuming for these last 41 years that anything less than a zero is zero. I hope I haven't been doing it wrong. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Richmond, VA, USA
|
Quote:
The rock tears a small hole in WoloWizard's dickie of incredible immaturity. Enraged, he raises his wand and aims a fireball at Shedore's spot (er, hex). And the battle goes on.
__________________
RVA_Grandpa ----------------------------------------- https://travelingthelabyrinth.blogspot.com We never really grow up; we only learn how to act in public. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: behind you
|
Quote:
In theory, that fireball will be a Big Bang! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: May 2015
|
You're doing it right; the minimum damage is zero, not one.
Missile spells in the new Wizard are the first exception that has a minimum damage roll in TFT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Both Magic Fist and Fireball have this qualifying statement in their description:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
It's not. It's a natural outcome of the math and in game logic assumptions. If I attack bare handed, doing 1d-4, and I roll a one. You can't do -3 damage to an enemy by in game logic, but you could do none, so that's what you do.
Missle spells calling out minimum damage implies this is not always the case, and are an exception to the base assumptions. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|