|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Niagara, Canada
|
I'm probably just missing a page number.
I'm thinking of an OPH based around a PC's belief "The truth is more important than being popular", probably for an average of -2 reaction penalty when it kicks in - but I want him to be able to roll to try to control himself, ala Compulsions and similar mental disadvantages. I can't seem to find the right combination of reaction penalty and cost-modifier: Reputation applies more to people who already know him than random strangers he might converse with, I can't find a decent 'self-control roll' Limitation, etc. Any suggestions?
__________________
Thank you for your time, -- DataPacRat "Then again, maybe I'm wrong." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Alternately you could always just apply Self-Control Ratings to the disad. I don't see how it would break anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Niagara, Canada
|
I'd have gone for that, but going from '-2 reaction: 10 points' to '-2 reaction: except on a self-control roll of 12 or less (x1 cost): 10 points' doesn't quite seem to make sense.
__________________
Thank you for your time, -- DataPacRat "Then again, maybe I'm wrong." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Edit: Removed, because I was ninja-ed by one of those I was trying to paraphrase.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. Last edited by Flyndaran; 08-04-2017 at 03:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Self-control number probably isn't appropriate because the problem of an OPH isn't that actually you acting on it, it's other people reacting to it.
Not displaying your OPH in the moment isn't going to do you any good unless the people you're interacting with don't know it's there.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
If you can control your compulsion to be cruel but factual then you've probably got a quirk and a reputation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Quote:
This does cause some problems (You can look up threads arguing about Callous and "Crazy Eyes"), but these disadvantages aren't about what people think of you, it's how they react to your behavior.
__________________
My Blog: Mailanka's Musing. Currently Playing: Psi-Wars, a step-by-step exploration of building your own Space Opera setting, inspired by Star Wars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Despite what the Basic description seems to say with the "people who notice" thing, the reaction penalty for an Odious Habit is priced for affects everybody all the time (-5 per -1 penalty). It doesn't appear to matter if you happen to be displaying the habit right now. I suppose people are assumed to have heard about your disgusting habit and react negatively even if you aren't actually eating a baby right now. Which frankly I think makes sense.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Or it averages out, since reaction rolls are reasonably random -- some people have heard of your nasty habit and react at -4, some haven't and react at no penalty, some people encounter you in the process of eating a baby and react at -10.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| odious personal habit, self-control number |
|
|