Steve Jackson Games Forums - View Single Post

Michelle · 09-06-2013, 12:40 PM

As the second player in bokenboy's scenario I need to clarify a few points.

When the second monster was added I didn't try to back out of the help we negotiated. That help had already been given. The second monster added 2 levels and 4 treasures to the prize. Bokenboy didn't have the cards to defeat him. I did but it would have cleaned me out. I told bokenboy I would play the cards to defeat the second monster for the additional 4 treasures (he was getting the levels). The THIRD player (not party to our deal) objected to our renegotiating and insisted I had to stick to the original deal - meaning I was cleaning out my hand for 2nd and 4th treasure while Jim got 3 levels and 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, & 8th treasure.

I still maintain it's perfectly valid to renegotiate the division of spoils when circumstances change (monsters are added). That's the real question we need answered.

09-06-2013, 12:40 PM	#4
Michelle Join Date: Sep 2013	Re: Wandering Monster/Negotiating Help As the second player in bokenboy's scenario I need to clarify a few points. When the second monster was added I didn't try to back out of the help we negotiated. That help had already been given. The second monster added 2 levels and 4 treasures to the prize. Bokenboy didn't have the cards to defeat him. I did but it would have cleaned me out. I told bokenboy I would play the cards to defeat the second monster for the additional 4 treasures (he was getting the levels). The THIRD player (not party to our deal) objected to our renegotiating and insisted I had to stick to the original deal - meaning I was cleaning out my hand for 2nd and 4th treasure while Jim got 3 levels and 1st, 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, & 8th treasure. I still maintain it's perfectly valid to renegotiate the division of spoils when circumstances change (monsters are added). That's the real question we need answered.