Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince Charon
I think that depends on how limited or generous the definitions we use are.
|
Always a problem in AI debates. We can't [define] intelligence clearly, and it's hard to duplicate something you can't define, or for that matter tell if you have succeeded.
No. It strikes me as Google with a paraphraser on top of it. The paraphraser does seem like an achievement on the path to natural language processing, which is often considered a key component of AI (I think that's debatable) but probably doesn't involve anything intelligence like. I actually think it's further from an AI than, say, Watson, that at least seems to have had some sort of effort at having the AI deal with semantic meaning.