Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Joy
Incorrect.
|
I hope you meant "No, it isn't possible". Anyway, that's what I was curious about
: manifestation of this rules quirk depends on turn order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnome
My group has run into these kinds of problems many times in play, and I've never come up with a satisfying solution.
|
Currently I tend to consider it a rule abuse. If B, C, D and E were NPCs, as a GM I would make С, D and E take attacking maneuvers, not Wait. B still can take All-out Defense, of course.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereidalbel
Nope, they used Wait on Turn 1 so they could act out of order on Turn 2. Turn 3 is still A, then B, then C, then D, then E. No getting a free use of ATR out of Wait ;)
|
You see, if actual order of action is "AB BA BA" you can still claim that eventually everything will be OK and both sides will take actions one by one, but "A
B BA" fraction can be a huge advantage for B.