View Single Post
Old 05-17-2018, 12:36 PM   #32
ericthered
Hero of Democracy
 
ericthered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
Default Re: Large variance of SMs together

Quote:
Originally Posted by kirbwarrior View Post
I was worried a bit about ratios. I could work backwards, figuring out how many titans exist, then using their combined weight divided among each race to figure out how many of each live together. That would give a huge amount of faeries compared to the other races, though.
I wouldn't balance biomass. As you said, that gives a huge numeric advantage to the smaller beings. They should have a lesser advantage in terms of numbers.

Actually, I ran some numbers where each increase in SM reduced the numbers by 1/3rd, and each decrease in SM increased numbers by 50%. I ended up with pixies still forming just over 50% of the population and Titans forming over 80% of the mass.

here are the numbers I got. Forgive my names.
Code:
        Size    Mass        Number    Weight
Titans    6    140000        9    1,229,081
Giants    3    5000        30    148,148
Trolls    2    1500        44    66,667
Burlies    1    500        67    33,333
Humans    0    150        100    15,000
Dwarfs    -1    50        150    7,500
Hobbits    -2    15        225    3,375
Little Ones    -3    5        338    1,688
Pixies    -6    0.15        1,139    171
                            2,101    1,504,962
For contrast, doubling or halving gives Titans 60% of the weight and Pixies 80% of the population.
You could also consider a scheme where Some race in the middle is unusually well represented, and the big folks have equal mass than them and the little ones equal numbers.
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic

Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog

Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one!

Last edited by ericthered; 05-17-2018 at 12:40 PM.
ericthered is online now   Reply With Quote