Quote:
Originally Posted by Icelander
. . . don't account for the lack of historically attested empires.
|
Aha, it's a whole world of the First Reich.
Quote:
|
Will this work even if the stars are entirely wrong?
|
This only demands that the naked-eye stars are the same, which has already been established. If they are totally different, then this can't be Earth anyway.
Quote:
All three have some points in their favour. What would they mean, respectively, to you?
* It's consistent with the eclipse-based date.
|
That means that this Earth's and Moon's motions with respect to the Sun are consistent with the original Earth, and don't disprove the idea that the ASN are in the past. The other two options do disprove that idea.
Quote:
|
* It's exactly where Hipparchus placed it, and does not move.
|
That means that the world is mystically defined, and astrology is fundamental.
Quote:
|
* it's where it was in April 1945, plus time passed since then.
|
That means this world was created for the ASN, and the creator went to the trouble of making the sky act right, at a basic level, as well as look right to the naked eye, but was neglectful of some details.