Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraydak
People say that muskets are much, much easier to use than bows. I find this extremely hard to believe. Can anyone help me?
(1) Muskets are much more complex to use.
(2) Beyond a few 10s of yards, arrow flight times become long enough that accuracy is nigh irrelevant against moving targets (working from sub 100 yd/sec speeds). At longer distances, bows move into plunging fire (forget about accuracy/skill) where muskets would still have nearly flat trajectories.
|
Aiming bows had to be done by experience, not by sighting the arrow, since warbows were drawn so far back. And even hitting the right
area is non-trivial at hundreds of yards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kraydak
The only way I can make sense of "bows are harder" is the sheer muscle strength/conditioning needed for sustained 100+lb bow use. One the other hand, that shouldn't take too long to gain and would be easy to lose through a bout of disuse or poor food supply.
|
Historically, it took about ten years to gain. We're not just talking about muscle mass, we're talking about developing muscular and skeletal strength in areas that most people are very weak in. Archers were built differently because they had been shooting heavy bows since childhood.