Quote:
Originally Posted by Grayscale
I suppose this makes sense, so we would end up with 6d pi++ linked [1d(0.2) burn]. Does actually look like the scene I linked above.
|
According to
HT it should have (0.5) penetration, and I'd say it's a follow-up, not a linked attack (
HT also thinks that). Thus:
6d(0.5) pi++ follow-up [1d(0.2) burn]
Remember that if a an attack with a follow-up doesn't penetrate, you get the effect of a linked attack.