Steve Jackson Games Forums

Steve Jackson Games Forums (https://forums.sjgames.com/index.php)
-   GURPS (https://forums.sjgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Extra Level of Malediction Balanced? (https://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=97003)

JCurwen3 09-19-2012 09:04 PM

Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
Do you think an extra level of Malediction enhancement (a +250% version) would be balanced?

Long-Range enhancement (p. P108) starts at +50% and steps up by +50% per level. Range penalties start at -1/yard (like a Regular spell); the next level uses penalties as per the Size and Speed/Range Table, the next level after that uses Long-Distance Modifiers (p. B241), and the next level has has no range penalties at all.

Malediction starts at +100%, and also steps up by +50% per level. It has the same progression - first spell range penalties (+100%), then S&S/R table penalties (+150%), then long-distance (+200%).

So my question is whether a level of Malediction at +250% that has no range penalties is balanced at +250%? Or might there be pitfalls?

Christopher R. Rice 09-19-2012 09:07 PM

Re: Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JCurwen3 (Post 1445770)
Do you think an extra level of Malediction enhancement (a +250% version) would be balanced?

Long-Range enhancement (p. P108) starts at +50% and steps up by +50% per level. Range penalties start at -1/yard (like a Regular spell); the next level uses penalties as per the Size and Speed/Range Table, the next level after that uses Long-Distance Modifiers (p. B241), and the next level has has no range penalties at all.

Malediction starts at +100%, and also steps up by +50% per level. It has the same progression - first spell range penalties (+100%), then S&S/R table penalties (+150%), then long-distance (+200%).

So my question is whether a level of Malediction at +250% that has no range penalties is balanced at +250%? Or might there be pitfalls?

I don't see a issue with it off hand, you can combine the effects of Malediction 3 and Long-Range 1 and get that effect. So yeah, seems right to me.

Ghostdancer

kirbwarrior 09-19-2012 10:04 PM

Re: Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
For purposes of in game, it really isn't much different than Malediction 3, so if you allow level 3, level 4 should be okay.

Lamech 09-20-2012 12:38 AM

Re: Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
Eh Malediction 4, is quite different from three. (Especially with space.) If you have a global detect, you can lock anyone, anywhere and malediction them away. Although that's more of an issue with detect than malediction. It allows you to shoot at people who can't fight back.

kirbwarrior 09-20-2012 02:52 AM

Re: Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lamech (Post 1445812)
Eh Malediction 4, is quite different from three. (Especially with space.) If you have a global detect, you can lock anyone, anywhere and malediction them away. Although that's more of an issue with detect than malediction. It allows you to shoot at people who can't fight back.

Right, Space is where a mile is nothing distance, so it would be quite different. I was thinking on planets, the difference of a mile's -2 for Mal 3 isn;t that big of a deal.

B9anders 09-20-2012 05:46 AM

Re: Extra Level of Malediction Balanced?
 
In a space campaign of appropriate power level, not unbalanced. You'll still need a sense to lock on to your target of course.

Characters like Moondragon, Mantis and Warlock in Cosmic Marvel obviously have this enhancement as they were using their abilities across inter-planetary, and sometimes even cross-dimensional, distances.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.