Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
So high energy physics is probably not a good option due to a shortage of accelerators of ground-breaking power. I doubt their ability to re-build their propulsuion system mid-flight and even moreso to re-design their mission profile. So I don't think propulsion is likely. Life sciences and genetics doesn't need as much hardware as big physics and looks good. Math needs scratch paper, coffee and geniuses to consume the two previous items. Raise a generation of kids with IQ+2 and Mathematial Ability 4 and you ought to see _something_. The Great Bird of the Galaxy only knows if it will be useful to you or anyone else for a century or two. Cybernetics and robotics looks likely and would be useful for maintenance. Working in the sewers never seemed to do Ed Norton's mential health much good (old people will get this joke). Inventing robots is probably more useful. |
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
|
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
If the robots are responsible for maintaining the ship then it seems to me that people would be maintaining the robots. Helping maintain the machinery that is the difference between life and death is different from helping maintain the infrastructure of a city you could leave. The important thing isn't that everyone is highly relevant to the maintenance of the ship but that they perceive that they are somehow responsible for preserving their own lives. Quote:
|
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Generation Ships
It would help to have some kind of suspended animation for when things get sticky and the biosphere needs time to mend.
|
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
|
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
|
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
Fewer active passengers, all other things being equal, is going to mean less mass devoted to habitat spaces resulting in better acceleration to crusing speed (and possibly a higher crusing speed). One take on this I have seen was the idea of colony ships with a small generation ship crew tending hibernating passengers. Naturaly it didn't end so well. |
Re: Generation Ships
I meant having the suspension as an emergency reserve, not an assumed way to increase efficiency.
It would be like having lifeboats on a ship, but always have a portion of your crew living in them. It defeats the purpose or a reserve. |
Re: Generation Ships
Quote:
Atomic Rockets states "Poul Anderson noted that there is probably a limit to how long a human will remain viable in cryogenic suspension (in other words they have a shelf-life). Naturally occuring radioactive atoms in the body will cause damage. In a non-suspended person such damage is repaired, but in a suspended person it just accumulates. He's talking about this damage happening over suspensions lasting several hundred years, during interstellar trips. This may require one to periodically thaw out crew members and keep them awake for long enough to heal the damage before re-freezing them." Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.