Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
I know that helmets made from aluminum make you immune to mind control, especially if they are pyramid shaped.
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Indeed. Aluminium blocks proper orgone flow.
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Aluminum armor in the field has turned out to be not-a-good-idea since 1965. It fragments a lot worse than steel, so a small hole becomes a small hole plus a lot of shrapnel. It also has a marvelous tendency to catch fire. I was in a squadron that had a plane deployed on a carrier in the Med when the Belknap caught fire. It had a mostly-aluminum superstructure. It burned so hot that our guys on the carrier almost got cooked just being close to it!
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
|
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
Meanwhile, back on topic, what property is used to evaluate DR for a material? The "aluminum is 1/3 steel" makes me think modulus of elasticity? There are aluminum alloys which can get about as hard as steel. |
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Quote:
Aluminum still has plenty of problems, of course. Probably chief of which is that it burns. Look up USS Belknap for a good example (short version: aluminum superstructure completely destroyed, steel hull in need of new paint). |
Re: How good would Aluminum armor be?
Apparently the problem is that aluminium collapses under a lower temperature than steel, not that it burns better than steel. It does conduct heat a lot better which can be a problem on ships. Aluminium suffers more from metal fatigue than steel.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.