Re: Dodging Difficulty
Quote:
|
Re: Dodging Difficulty
Quote:
Suppose that Average Joe is walking on the street - like almost everyone does it, that is without encumbrance. A bad guy walks in front of him, draws a knife and says "Give me all your money, bastard!" Joe refuses and the bad guys attacks. Joe's effective dodge is 8 + 3 (retreat), that is 11. 62.5% chance of avoiding the blow without the least training! Now, suppose that this bad guys has a gun instead of a knife. If Joe dodges and drops, following the Basic Set rules, Joe's chance of avoiding the bullet are exactly the same... 62.5%. Every one with common sense would say that it is far much easier to dodge a knife blow than a man who has just to pull the trigger of his gun... And this is, to my mind, what Benz 72 was meaning. But, as Sir Pudding said it, there already are optional rules for those who want more realistic dodge. Limiting Dodge, in Martial Arts, pages 122-123, for instance. Or those in Tactical Shooting - which I didn't buy yet. And remember that the GM may always give extra modifiers for specific situations. No matter how comprehensive a role playing system can be, it can't anticipate every contingency. Hitting a foot is easier with a spear than with a knife, for instance. Likewise, dodging some blows is easier than dodging some others. So, the GM is free to add a task difficulty modifier if he fit that they are appropriate. See Basic Set pages 345-346. Just don't forget to divide them by 2 for defense rolls. |
Re: Dodging Difficulty
I have read it that Dodging represents anything an untrained person can do that will cause an attack to hit.
The bit that seems screwy to me is the extra's you can choose to add retreating and dropping. They both should be decision that you make on your turn rather than as a reaction. Worked examples DX 10 1point of skill in either knife or gun gives a 50% chance of hitting. Does the attacker have a 50% chance of missing if the defender does nothing? I don't think that fits so we need some tactics. With the knife he telegraphs +4 to hit and +2 to dodge and uses an all out attack determined (it could be AoA strong for more damage). Retreating makes sense here it's a perfect example of the "eek a pointy thing" response. Result Skill 18 and +2 to dodge or skill 14, +5 to dodge and +2 damage. Now for the gun A couple of seconds pointing the gun at the target probably counts as aiming. Add an all out attack determined. Would you really throw yourself to floor in front of a man threatening you with a gun instead of running away or attempting to fight back? I wouldn't. So skill 13 to 15 and no bonus to dodge. We could run the percentages but I am pretty sure the knife is less likely to connect. |
Re: Dodging Difficulty
Quote:
The bad guy with the knifeFollowing GURPS rules, Average Joe wold better dodge and drop than try to run away... But, of course, the problem with dodging and dropping is that he would be prone just after... Which would reduce drastically his chance to survive a second shot. |
Re: Dodging Difficulty
Thanks for doing the maths.
I didn't like the AoA determined for the knife because I thought it pushed the to-hit chances to far apart and the strong attack would guarantee the knife did some real damage. If the target has committed to dropping to the floor, that's a lot more movement for the shooter to react to than normal. It's the choosing to drop that seems weird to me. Using a wait action to drop on being shot at makes more sense to me. |
Re: Dodging Difficulty
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.