shortsword vs broadsword
 

Is there any reason why i should choose a shortsword over a broadsword? (other than having a low ST or being $100 poorer)?

What are the advantages of the shortsword?

I think that, in hystory , it was used for very close range encounters or to fight in tight conditions (ex: a roman legion). But in gurps i dont know any rule that whould make it better than a broadsword for that.

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

Well, to be honest there is none... I also never saw a char using a shortsword if broadswords were available...

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

I'm using Low Tech (since it essentially erratas the weapon list), just so you know.

You'd use a shortsword if:

• You're in a TL 1, rather than TL 2, setting
• You're physically weaker (ST 10 and 3 lbs vs ST 8 and 2 lbs)
• You want to spend less and...
• Get the same Thrusting damage (both the shortsword and the broadsword are Thr+1 imp)

If you're using GURPS Martial Arts and using A Matter Of Inches, a shortsword generally draws faster than a broadsword

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

Nope. Short swords are inferior. Take'em if you're cheap or weak, otherwise, go with a real sword.

They're cheap! That's a pretty hefty advantage! And they are lightweight, if you primarily use another mode of combat(archery, spear, polearm), having a lightweight back-up weapon isn't a bad idea.

There shouldn't be a rule, because shortswords were rarely used by the legions themselves. The Earlier Gladius tended to be longer than the later imperial versions, on that very blurry edge of "shortsword...sword" territory. The roman legionaries themselves fought in a looser formation than people commonly assume(3 foot spacing, or 6 foot, 3 foot is more likely), rather than in a dense, tight formation. Hoplites, especially spartans, sometimes used a "long knife" style weapon, but they fought in an extremely dense formation.

In my own campaigns, I've done away with the short sword skill entirely. I use Knife, One Handed Sword, and Two-handed sword. If the weapon is smaller than 24" in overall length, it's a knife. If it's longer than that, and used in one handed, it's a sword. I use familiarity penalties for melee weapons(something most folk dont) based on hilt( Cruciform vs Round Hilt vs. "S-shell" hilt), Blade typology(long, short, broad, distal-tip, curved, straight, for example) and weight. A swordsman who has trained with short-bladed sword with a round hilt, if he picks up a knightly sword that has a cruciform hilt and a long, narrow blade, he gets -4 to his sword skill until he has familiarized himself. For example, a roman legionaire who uses a mainz pattern gladius("short sword"), but picks up a Spatha from an auxilary, would be at a -2 to skill(short vs. long blade, same hilt) untill he practiced with the weapon for a while.

The shortsword has typically been a weapon of common people, the poor, a secondary weapon for support troops, or a back-up weapon. Longer blades have been in vogue for a very long time, and served alongside short swords in many classes, gradually displacing them from the primary arm. I'd hazard the guess that this could mean that short swords didn't stand up to the test of the battlefield as well.

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

Notably, it was not their primary weapon.

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

i just think that there should be a penalty for figthing with a large sword in a tight place or formation.

Or maybe give a shortsword less penalty to stab in close combat..

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

There already is When use a Reach 1, or Reach 1-2, but not for Reach C,1 or C

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

There is, it's -4 to skill for each point of reach. The shortsword just doesn't gain an advantage here, because I'm not clear there should be one: the difference between shortswords and broadswords are less than a foot and a pound, and broadsword style weapons were generally favored over shortswords for most of history. Either close-combat/tight formation fighting wasn't prevalent enough for short swords to be popular weapons, or they weren't quite effective in close-combat.

People who fought in dense formations appear to have preferred spears, which allow them to fight far more effectively.

A simple house rule is to give the shortsword half the penalty of a longer sword(so -2, rather than -4). I don't like it, but it's an option.

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

Extrapolating, I'd probably say it's -1 for 12-17", -2 for 18-23", -3 for 24-29", -4 for 30-35", etc, which would put shortswords at -2 or -3, broadswords and sabres at -4, bastard swords and rapiers at -5.

Re: shortsword vs broadsword
 

Quick list of pseudorealistic houserules to give shortswords some advantages when compared with broadswords:
= To Fast Draw and Quick-Sheath a shortsword you get +2. (conversely, you could get -2 to fast-draw longswords and bastard swords).

= Reduce close combat penalty to -2

= Discount shortswords to $300

= When a fight is very crowded, the ceiling somewhat low or similar situation, give to broadswords an environmental penalty of -1, but rule that shortswords and shorter weapons are immune from this penalty.
(if you use an hex map, you could say that an hex is considered "crowded" if 4 of his adjacent hexes are occupied by characters, obstacles or walls).

= Raise the broadsword MinST to 11. This will make little difference to PCs inclined for combat and typical NPC thugs, but it will make a shortsword more wieldy for "civilians" ST 9-10.