Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 1015324)

At any rate, do note the progression:

• At distance: Damage is ×1, divided by (10 × distance in yards) in vacuum, (3 × distance in yards) in air, (2 × distance in yards) for FAE in air, or (distance in yards) in water. Use this for distant combat explosions.
• At touch on exterior: Damage is ×1. Use this for direct hits in combat.
• Tamped or shaped on exterior (High-Tech, pp. 182-183): Halves explosive weight needed. Effectively, damage is ×1.4. Use this for most demolition.
• Fully contained on exterior (p. B415): Maximum damage. Effectively, damage is ×1.7. Use this for demolition where explosive is in gap or applied over full surface of object.
• Internal (p. B415): Wounding, and effectively damage, is ×3. Use this for explosive bullets in flesh, for instance. In the head (e.g., cyberpunk brain-bombs), use ×4! For targets with No Vitals or Homogenous, treat as tamped (×1.4) only.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 1015364)

Yeah, in the brain, use ×4. And no, don't use maximum damage for this. The ×3 or ×4 for being inside someone is instead of that. "Maximum damage" is just a way to avoid saying "×12/7."

Originally Posted by David L Pulver (Post 16463)

____________________________________

Vehicle ST does not relate to its loaded weight. In terms of characters, vehicles have PAYLOAD, the Advantage of having extra load above Strength.

A vehicle's power output, of course, relates to its total loaded weight. A vehicle's ST is essentially what is left over after subtracting the power went into ST and speed. In practice, the limit is more structural ST, so find ST the same way you find HP: (the cube root of vehicle empty weight in tons) x 50.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 2288140)

No, Compartmentalized Mind (CM) does not grant multiple copies of abilities for the purposes of switching alternate abilities, consuming limited uses, triggering cooldowns, and so forth!

All mechanics that make abilities cheaper do so under the assumption that they'll actually limit the character. Making CM a one-stop shop for working around such things makes it a one-stop shop for cheesy abuse. It might seem fine when you're paying 50 points to get around innate usage limits on a cheap ability . . . but what happens when someone takes Ability 1 [1,000] and Ability 2 [1,000] as alternative abilities, pays 1,200 points, drops 50 points for CM 1, and enjoys 2,000 points of abilities – along with all the incidental benefits of CM – for just 1,250 points? That would be a crock.

Thus, the answer is a definitive "No way!" The main benefit of CM is extra actions. That's what 50 points fairly buys.

Originally Posted by B513

Borrowed Technology
A society can be familiar with tech-
nology that it does not itself possess.
This is frequently the case for low-tech
societies with high-tech neighbors,
and for colonies. A village with Iron
Age technology (TL2) might be quite
familiar with the TL3 steel weapons
carried by travelers, and richer vil-
lagers might have a few, but local
smiths could not duplicate or repair
them. Express this as “TL2/3.”

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 2358611)

A society with some TL8 gadgets isn't a TL8 society; it's a lower-TL society with gadgets. Transhuman Space went into it in more detail, and an upcoming supplement will discuss it more, but in brief:

The world average is TL4 or perhaps TL5; it's just that the world's cutting edge is TL8, so the TL4 parts have TL5-8 gadgets, the TL5 parts have TL6-8 gadgets, the TL6 parts have TL7-8 gadgets, and the TL7 parts have TL8 gadgets. But to "be TL8," the majority of your gadgets have to be nominally TL8. Don't mistake the absence of the specific visuals of late-medieval Europe or Steam Age London for the absence of TL4 or TL5 realities.

Privileged people living in high-tech societies tend to forget that they don't define the average, and tend to see the presence of their benevolence toward lower-TL regions as proof that they've raised the TL there. They haven't. The single biggest marker is probably "What's the modifier to aging rolls where you live?" (p. B444). If you're rolling against HT+1 rather than HT+5, your society is probably TL4 and not TL8, whatever gadgets you have.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 2361725)

"Development" is shorthand for what our editors do: Handle queries, proposals, questions that arise during writing, draft reviews, questions that arise from playtesting, and editing. It can include the game design and writing itself. All of the hands-on work this implies is done in unformatted text or using Microsoft Word.

"Production" describes what our production artists do: Lay out the text; design the pages, including headers, footers, fills, bleeds, and page numbers; insert art and diagrams; create a title page (and sometimes a cover), table of contents, and index; and finally turn it all into a PDF. Stuff you'd do in, say, InDesign, or QuarkXPress.

"Production" follows "development," with the exception of last-minute changes made when the writer and editor look at the near-final work of the production artist.

Anyway, I handle "development" but Nikki handles "production." Once I start talking about something being "in production," it's totally out of my hands except from a possible last review of the product ("production review") before we upload it for you to buy.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 2361739)

Since Steven's name has come up:

"Project management" is assigning writers, editors, illustrators, and production artists to projects, and making sure these people communicate; setting up playtests; facilitating project handoffs from development to production; making sure that developers review the resulting production output; and establishing timelines for all of the above, as well as release dates. Most of this is done via email. It's concurrent with all of development and production.

That's Steven's job. So for every Kromm and Nikki you add, you need at least one Steven and possibly two.

Originally Posted by jackcelso (Post 2427165)

Hi
if a Giant SM+4, occupying an area of ​​2 hexes of radius is cast with a spell mass sleep what would be the FP cost?

1. Base cost: 3. Minimum radius 2yards. So cost 6 covering the entire area where the Giant is.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 1582969)

For those who need an official statement: You base magic spells on IQ + Magery as if that sum were your IQ. When any rule says to add an advantage level to an attribute for the purpose of learning a skill of any kind, the meaning is that you use attribute + advantage level in place of the raw attribute for all purposes.

Originally Posted by Kromm (Post 428428)

What's being missed, mostly, are the subtleties of these traits.

Confused kicks in when confusing stuff is going on around you. A couple of guards talking across a room don't count . . . nothing is going on around you, and their words don't magically cast a Daze spell on you. If the guards were shouting back and forth across your hiding place, or shooting their guns off in your general direction because they were bored, then Confused would become important. An assassin would not suffer from his disad at all if he worked alone, snuck up on his target from afar, and had to look through a scope from a quiet rooftop. This wouldn't change if there were three other people visible in his scope, clearly talking. It would change if some watchmen started talking on the roof he was using as a sniper perch. The point is, you're completely decisive -- you just can't have distractions aimed at you.

Indecisive affects choices of paths, not tiny actions and subcomponents of actions. An indecisive warrior basically needs a CO. As long as somebody tells him what to do, he'll do it as well as he can. It's when he isn't sure about the general tactical plan that he'll get in trouble: rush or hold? Flank or frontal charge? Run for his wounded ally or continue to shoot at the foe? Things like having four targets or two possible weapons or three potential defenses wouldn't be relevant. The point is, your reflexes work fine, and you can always use the most sensible attack or defense -- you just can't have multiple broad course of action open to you.