| Phil Masters |
05-18-2007 04:56 AM |
Re: Notes on Using GURPS Ultra-Tech (4e) in TS: Chapter 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by DryaUnda
This is a Complexity 5 program we're talking about here, not just Dragon Dictate with bigger tailfins. Think of it as a translator program that translates from the spoken version of a language to the written one.
|
I'm happy to believe that better writing technology makes writing faster - this here PC is a bit quicker than a quill pen, I think. But it'll only make it better in the sense that it's possible to revise and polish a bit more in a given period (which will be somewhat necessary anyway, because writing faster makes it tempting to jot down any old tosh as a first draft and polish it later).
Eventually, one may get expert systems software that can revise and polish the text acceptably by itself. But then, you're using the program's Writing skill, not the human author's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DryaUnda
Abuse how?
|
Any time the PCs have to attempt a burglary or an ambush, they'll be faffing about bouncing weird sound effects and shaky snatches of conversation off walls and ceilings, trying to distract their opponents (and sinking into bad practical jokes along the way). Trying to impersonate opposing senior officers will probably be especially popular (as will fart gags, with some groups). Of course, this shouldn't work too well, at least after a while, but things will get noisy and messy at times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DryaUnda
Oh no you d'n't! We can have Complexity 7 programs being people but not able to teach them? (That's just for quirks and Average skills.)
|
No problem with advanced education software. Handwaving sleep/REM time into learning time is another matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DryaUnda
From the player's point of view, they can choose from either needing no sleep to 16 hours towards a skill point a night. Wouldn't this be in line with mutable point totals?
|
Mutable points totals are a red herring here - though even if that's the rule in use, it shouldn't mean "PCs have ever-accelerating points totals because they've minimaxed the learning system with the aid of some dubious new fictional technology". The problem is that idea that time spent dreaming is nothing but wasted potential learning time.
I don't know exactly why people dream; I don't think that anyone does right now. But the best evidence seems to be that it's a defragging process in which the mind sorts out its memory storage, or at least some sort of rest time. Interrupting that to jam yet more stuff into memory strikes me as a quick way to drive the subject barking mad.
|