Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
the way I see it, I don't think it would make sense to make sides roll in the case of an ambush, I would make the ambushers win but the ambushees be affected by partial surprise (mental stun but IQ rolls with a +1 per additionnal attempt). I think you make both sides roll in case both groups are surprised to see which side recovers first from surprise. Example : You open a door of a room where you thought it was empty only to come face to face with a group of goblins which weren't expecting you and didn't hear you. Like you too, I don't think it would make sense for the defenders to act before the ambushers. |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
|
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
In an Amush type situation, surprise doesn't necessarily even come up. The ambushers simply use Wait maneuvers and/or Opportunity Fire. As soon as the PCs enter withing range, the guns start shooting (or the Orcs use Move and Attack maneuvers). Either way, the ambushed party doesn't get to act because this turn, they spent their actions already - they used a Move maneuver to walk into the trap. So the attacker will get a full turn for free (unless thye're spotted, of course) no matter how high the victims reflexes are.
(as an aside, if the ambushed party isn't even aware of the attack - sudden fire from a hidden machine gun encampment - then they won't get Active Defenses, either). In the second turn, the ambushed party may very well be surprised (or not, if liberally equipped with Combat Reflexes or ETS), partially or otherwise. In other words: Turn 1 PCs: walk into a chasm, failing all Per rolls. Orcs: start firing crossbows from their hiding places. PCs don't get Active Defense or any other actionbs - they were busy "walking into the chasm" Turn 2 PCs: check for surprise, if unsurprised, dive for cover Orcs: continue shooting, this time however talking into account Active Defenses for unsurprised targets |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Everyone has good points, and of course none of them provide concrete answers (it's a matter of taste, seems like). I like Wedhro's method the best, because it is very clean and well-defined, but that doesn't mean anyone else's opinions are anny less valid.
I think that the status of any two parties can be described as on of the five choices below, EXCEPT for planned ambushes! They are a special case. READINESS OF GROUP
Using that list, all the rules for Surprise make sense if you compare the readiness of the two groups. The fuzziness comes when you consider actual ambushes. Ambushes are a special case because it's the one time the would-be attackers have dug in and actually planned a sneak attack on an enemy. I think they should be handled as total surprise if none of the defenders notice the amush before the ambush is sprung, no matter HOW alert the defenders are. If the defenders DO catch the ambush before it is sprung, then you would proceed normally (both groups would be classified then as "Members are all quite wary and strongly suspect that an attack is imminent.") I just answered my own question, I think. |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
A crucial component that people are missing is this: In an ambush, if the ambushers make their Camouflage and/or Stealth rolls, and/or the victims make their rolls against Observation or Per by less or not at all, then the victims don't spot the ambushers. That's the entire point of Camouflage and Stealth; see the skill text. A person who hasn't detected a potential attacker doesn't get a defense roll when that foe attacks; see the bottom of the first column on p. B374. So if it's an ambush (i.e., attackers remain unspotted) and not a risky assault by the intended victims (i.e., would-be ambushers have good positions but are sighted and engaged), the ambushers ALWAYS get one free attack against no defenses.
AFTER that attack, you resolve surprise. If the victims of the ambush were wary, use Partial Surprise. The opposing leader -- if he wasn't killed in the opening salvo -- might rally his men and take the initiative. This is why there's a modifier for one side being leaderless; always shoot at the guy with the radio. However, this is a situation where one side is more alert than the other, as flagged in the rules, and the ambushers should get a large bonus. Between that and taking out leaders, the modifiers should favor the ambushers. It isn't automatic, though. Even if the ambushers somehow lose the initiative, all this really does is give the victims a "lull" in which to move, find cover, and/or look for their attackers. This is assuming that the ambush was a good one -- i.e., the leader of the ambushers made his Tactics roll -- and the ambushers are hidden some distance away from a location that offers their prey little cover. Victims who choose to counterattack might get a second or two in which to do so, but they aren't likely to hit anything if they're shooting at dug-in, concealed ambushers. If the victims were caught with their pants down, use Total Surprise. In that case, the ambushers will continue to get "free attacks" until their victims do something useful. In either case, once all surprise wears off, the ambushers will still have the advantages of bracing, concealment, cover, high ground, and/or properly deployed heavy weapons -- again, assuming their leader made his Tactics roll. Even if the victims seize the initiative, they won't be scoring hits with the same reliability as their attackers. An example might look like this: 1st Platoon digs in around a barren stretch of road that LT Smith knows the enemy must traverse (successful roll against Smith's Tactics-12). SFC Jones has them place Claymores and set up MGs on high ground overlooking the road, and hide their positions with scrub and netting (successful roll against Jones' Tactics-14). The GM gives them +1 for equipment (nets and facepaint) and +2 more for having lots of time. The average trooper has Camouflage-12 (it's an Easy skill), so they roll against 15. |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Expertly explained . . . I believe that resolves all of my issues.
Thank you, Dr. Kromm! |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
Thank you in advance, Dr. Kromm |
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Questions Concerning Total/Partial Surprise
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.