Re: Air performance
Quote:
|
Re: Air performance
Quote:
|
Re: Air performance
Quote:
|
Re: Air performance
I've read that the major difference between Vietnam era fighters and modern ones is the huge reduction in maintenance. My dad was a crew chief stationed in Germany around 1960 and said only once did he see the whole squadron operational. That was the Cuban missile crisis and involved ignoring redundant systems being not redundant.
|
Re: Air performance
Quote:
|
Re: Air performance
Quote:
As for jets, 1940 is just about the point flight-worthy jets started being produced, and the mid-point of the first turboprop's production run. It's also the point where penicillin was shown to be producible in useful quantities, though mass production didn't start for a couple of years. |
Re: Air performance
Quote:
...has no manned jet aircraft with an "entered service" date before June 1944. As to the first turboprop's production run...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_Viscount ....has the Vickers Viscount not even flying until 1948. Doesn't look much like 1940 to me. |
Re: Air performance
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Air performance
Quote:
Since the question is when the technology is available and not when it was first used for the specific purpose of blowing people up, 1940 sounds like a "good enough" date. Jet engines were invented before the date, and jet-powered aircraft regarded as successful were flying on or before that date. |
Re: Air performance
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.