Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
So, if two figures are engaged, and the higher DX figure decides to disengage on his action phase, with a Spear, the other figure cannot attack with a normal weapon (say a Sword). Next turn the sword guy wins initiative and then moves the 1 hex to engage the spearman. Can he move the one hex and DEFEND instead of ATTACKING? This way, although the spearman gets a +2 DX to defend against the swordsman moving adjacent to him, and an extra die of damage (if he hits), the swordsman forces the spearman to use 4 dice instead of 3. But, if the swordsman just moves adjacent, and does not attack, does the spearman still get the +2 DX adjustment, and is the swordsman even allowed to move adjacent, and NOT attack (defend, instead)?
The rulebook does not break this down properly... THX |
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Standing against a single hex move only grants the +2 DX (and first strike) and not the extra die of damage.
The math favors a sword attack. Example: ST 11, DX 13, 2-h spear(1d+1) ST 12, DX 12, Broadsword(2d), Small Shield(1) Spearman disengages first turn and steps one back. Swordsman (with nobody adjacent) changes his own option(ITL 102) to disengage (Valid because was engaged during movement ITL 103) and steps up to reengage. (Note one hex in any direction by ITL 106) |
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Quote:
To answer Major Ross's question, it depends, since this is a grey area. I would argue that yes, the rules suggest that the spear wielder would get the +2 DX if attacking the incoming figure, even if that figure is defending. The whole issue of whether you can move and defend is the subject of much discussion, but the consensus seems to be that you can (best to checkw/your GM first). |
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
I think the answer is yes, the swordsman can step 1 hex and defend. It is ambiguous because defend is organized as a 'shift and...' option in the LE materials, but I believe it was clearer in the older editions that you could move up to half your MA and defend, and nothing in the current edition seems to explicitly contradict that.
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
If the Swordsman wins the Initiative and moves adjacent to the Spearman he may DEFEND, because now he is Engaged.
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Well reasoned. Though I think it would also apply if the swordsman lost initiative but managed to move to engagement range during the movement phase.
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Yes. What is important is that as the status of being Engaged or Disengaged changes so do the Options. It is pointless to declare Options because part of the Option happens during Movement and part happens during Actions, and what happens during Movement can change your Options instantly before Actions, or even before the second side to move Movement. The players move according to Initiative and perform Actions in AdjDX order.
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Why can't a disengaged person take the Disengage option (if they've moved half move or less) in order to move away from a Jab or such?
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Quote:
|
Re: Pole Weapons: Attack / Defense Question
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.