Steve Jackson Games Forums

Steve Jackson Games Forums (https://forums.sjgames.com/index.php)
-   Ogre Video Game (https://forums.sjgames.com/forumdisplay.php?f=96)
-   -   Facepalm On-Demand (https://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=152377)

Eugee 10-20-2017 01:29 PM

Facepalm On-Demand
 
Pull up a Mk5 Attacks Skirmish Game, and set both sides to AI.

Holy crap it's hard to watch. Especially the *ridiculous* number of 1:2 attacks it will attempt. GEVs getting killed by a M2 OGRE with no MBs is the saddest thing. It doesn't feel like the AI looks even one move ahead.

Maybe it was watching 8 GEVs take 1:2 shots at the missiles all the way to the center line.

GranitePenguin 10-20-2017 01:53 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eugee (Post 2129756)
Pull up a Mk5 Attacks Skirmish Game, and set both sides to AI.

Holy crap it's hard to watch. Especially the *ridiculous* number of 1:2 attacks it will attempt. GEVs getting killed by a M2 OGRE with no MBs is the saddest thing. It doesn't feel like the AI looks even one move ahead.

Maybe it was watching 8 GEVs take 1:2 shots at the missiles all the way to the center line.

AI vs AI is probably a very good way to expose some of these kinds of issues.

sir_pudding 10-20-2017 02:44 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
In the Beta the AI seemed smarter (although just to me, apparently, since everyone else seemed to report idiot AI). Although it was cheating by stacking 15 infantry. Were there different AIs in the various Beta builds?

I had a lot of trouble before, but since release I just get complete victories...

Ulzgoroth 10-20-2017 05:13 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
I wonder if the AI properly understands that missiles are one-shot. It seems to have way more interest in shooting them off (early, not late to knock critical hexes off the range) than I've ever seen justified.

GuyMacon 10-20-2017 05:17 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth (Post 2129809)
I wonder if the AI properly understands that missiles are one-shot. It seems to have way more interest in shooting them off (early, not late to knock critical hexes off the range) than I've ever seen justified.

Ideally, it will fire them off early if you are targeting them, and hold back if you are targeting other systems.

Ulzgoroth 10-20-2017 05:58 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GuyMacon (Post 2129810)
Ideally, it will fire them off early if you are targeting them, and hold back if you are targeting other systems.

I think there's room for extensive debate on that, albeit in no way specific to computer Ogre!

Honestly, I'd be more inclined to conserve missiles that the enemy is targeting, so that they keep targeting them rather than other components. On the other hand, missiles that the enemy is ignoring and I'm just carrying around are missiles that aren't helping me but could be preventing damage by knocking out enemy tanks.

(Ultimately, my usual approach is to conserve one or two missiles for a long-range threat to howitzers/CP and spend any others early to thin out armor - waiting to find out whether the enemy will focus on the missiles doesn't seem a great use of time.)

sir_pudding 10-20-2017 06:18 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
How valuable to you are missiles as ablative armor for your mains, instead of as missiles?

Ulzgoroth 10-20-2017 06:26 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sir_pudding (Post 2129816)
How valuable to you are missiles as ablative armor for your mains, instead of as missiles?

Valuable enough that I'd certainly target an enemy Ogre's mains before targeting its missiles.

That seems a valid symmetry to me.

GranitePenguin 10-20-2017 09:37 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
My missiles get fired early, and I generally ignore missiles because they will get fired at me so I don't have to waste shots on them. It's almost always better to shoot MB and treads over missiles. IF the Ogre can't move, who cares if it still has missiles?

Steve Jackson 10-21-2017 01:05 PM

Re: Facepalm On-Demand
 
I'll fire my missiles early if there are good targets - if there are just a few GEVs, I may want to take them out - and if the target is within range of my secondaries on my planned next move, I'm fine with disabling it.

But holding one back is always a valid way to distress the opponent.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.