Early Victorian guns?
I'm tinkering with a campaign set in 1850, and I'm looking to add some more options for the group's resident gun-bunny. I already have High-Tech: Adventure Guns, which has a few options, but I'm having trouble finding any more weapons suitable for the game. Can anyone provide examples, or sources I can ransack?
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
IIRC it was in 1850 that Colt started producing many of his famous revolvers -- the Navy (despite its 1851 model number) the First Model Dragoon, and the Baby Dragoon. Walkers were produced earlier but having a production run of 500 there weren't a lot out there. And most, IIRC, went to the Texas Rangers who might consider the possession of same by a non-Ranger an offense . . . A copy of Flayderman's Guide to American Firearms will give you a pretty good idea of at least when the major US firearms were around -- you have a lot of plains rifles (of which the Hawken is most famous), buggy rifles (for more sedate areas of the US in which your chance of meeting an unhappy bear is pretty low) and one- or two-barreled fowling pieces. "The complete encyclopedia of antique firearms : an expert guide to firearms and their development, A.E. Hartink" is not in my opinion quite up to its title but does offer a wide selection of early 19th century firearms, including German, French, and Belgian military and some civilian weapons. It has stats for length & weight of such. Should guve you some ideas. |
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
I should have been more specific. The campaign is set in London, starting in 1850. I have High Tech, but not Old West. Mostly, then, I'm looking to see what sorts of small arms civilians of all social strata might have available. High tech and Adventure guns have, between them, about... 6? handguns suitable for undercover work in the city. (I'm away from my books at the moment.)
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Here's a list of items in the collection of Museums Victoria in Melbourne, Australia, featuring a lot of (Australian) gold-rush era weapons. Looks like mainly cap-and-ball revolvers or pepperbox-style weapons, along with single-shot derringers. Names to look for would include Birmingham Small Arms (BSA), Hollis & Sheath, or I. Hollis & Sons, Tranter. Webley & Scott was still P. Webley & Sons at this point, but I'm not certain they were manufacturing revolvers by 1850, as opposed to long arms. The early Colts were also apparently popular.
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
One of the most popular pistols in Great Britain, in the 1850s, was the Colt Navy revolver, and some version of that Colt made up the bulk of the weapons sold. There weren't very many more varieties created, at that time, except in small batches by master armorers. You can base most of those on what appears in High Tech and other existing sources. The most popular British-made revolver was the Webley .455, which used brass cartridges, and that wasn't invented until the mid-1880s. A lot of people started to make pistols of all sorts, then, and it was a lot easier to do because industrialization had spread throughout Europe and most of North America. Until industrialization had spread throughout most of the Western world, the quantity and variety of goods of all sorts, including pistols, remained pretty limited. |
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
Remember you are in a city at peace not a war zone. Normal instruments of urban mayhem would be available. But the first revolvers were military grade in their day. |
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Didn't the Colts get quite popular during the Indian Rebellion? A bit late for the campaign start, though.
|
Re: Early Victorian guns?
Quote:
If you mean the Great Mutiny, or Sepoy Rebellion only a small minority(as is common enough really) of the Indian population declared for the Mogul most being neutralist, and some factions had bad blood with the Mogul too making it not "Indian" either. Regiments from those ethnic and religious groups often took the British side on the "enemies, enemy" principle and some regiments stayed loyal for the sake of military honor. Most of the hostility centered around the Company army so the term "mutiny" is accurate and of course if all of India was in rebellion or even a large portion the British would not have won. You may be right about the revolvers. I do remember the new rifles turned the tide for the infantry. Indian cavalry were greatly feared by English and having a revolver would have been as much a boon to them as to the Texans. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.