Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Hey, all!
As an update: I've just pushed an update to this issue. It has some updates to the "Halfway to Anywhere" article, plus some tweaks to the spreadsheet. If you have a Warehouse 23 account and subscribed to or bought that issue, you should've already gotten a notification by email. But just in case... feel free to swing by your Warehouse 23 library and redownload it! |
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Quote:
I finally bought this a few days ago. Halfway to anywhere was what drew me in, but I haven't even read it yet, having been drawn in by Ostara. Great setting, and another big win for David Pulver. Normally I'm a crunch kind of guy, but now I'm itching to read the other settings in the issue. Though I'm already plagued by a few head-scratchers about how the hives would work long-term. |
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
I have a small issue with the “Achieving Orbit” equation in the “Formulae by the Numbers” sidebar. It should be made clear that P is atmospheric drag expressed in mps/Atm of atmospheric pressure. Also, shouldn’t streamlining have some effect on this factor? (That is, by dividing the drag by 5 for streamlined ships?)
Dalton “who wouldn’t mind some rules for aerobraking” Spence |
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Quote:
|
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
~puts his shovel away~
Just thought I'd try to breathe a touch of life back into this again. I have recently launched my first rocket (IRL) and thought I'd share the results, so people might learn from my own experience. Despite a rather tumultuous design and fabrication experience, we did lift off on time and achieve roughly average apogee despite it being generally about 10% lower than the ideal predicted height. We are chalking this up to a mix of random variables (it was windy and we had to launch at an angle into the wind so we had a chance of recovering our rocket, plus random added weight in the form of unexpected tape, glue, paint, fillets, etc.; plus just the randomness inherent to models vs. reality.) So, if you are using Halfway to Anywhere, I'd suggest that it is a best case scenario, and GMs who want things to go wrong (or players who want to design for the unexpected) should consider a 10% difference in performance from the calculations - and not in your favor. All of that said, the GM should never be afraid to fudge in the favor of plot. After all, Armageddon wouldn't have been a very enjoyable movie if Bruce Willis et al died on launch.... A full review of the design, launch, and results experience will be posted on my blog this week. See my signature for details. |
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Quote:
|
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Quote:
I think if I were requiring Navigation rolls for plotting orbital transfers, I'd make a failure result in using up 10% more fuel or using up all remaining fuel, whichever is less dire. Frex, if you botch a Nav roll to get to Mars, at the least, you'll get to Mars, but you might not have fuel to get back to Earth, which provides an adventure hook. If you aim for the moon, with dV to spare, you might lose profits because you burn extra fuel on a failure. Regardless, on a crit fail, you should probably be in deep trouble, as determined by the GM (start making Mechanic or Engineering rolls to pull an Apolo 13 out of your butt). But again, this is really up to the GM. Halfway is meant as a guideline for GMs so they have bounds one what to expect of PCs' spaceships. |
Re: Pyramid #3/79: Space Atlas
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.