Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
Significantly more important here is the cost of food. A meat-eater can generally maintain a higher metabolism (and work rate) than a plant-eater, and a plant-eater eating high value foods such as seeds does better than one eating low value foods such as grasses, but that tends to be compensated for by the much higher availability of the less concentrated foods. The big advantage of grains is that grasses produce large amounts of concentrated food (seeds) relative to their overall production. This makes desert and tundra even lower value than their gross primary production implies, as concentrated food sources are generally meats, and also produces problems for forests, which put a great deal of energy into production of relatively indigestible twigs and leaves. |
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
Re: Selkies
Quote:
|
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
So I was thinking about the selkies. When compared to a humanoid a seal or whale have really short limbs and subsequently much more of their mass in the body, making them easier to insulate. Is it possible to insulate a humanoid to the degree of a seal and retain mobility of the limbs? Would the super thick fur of a sea otter do any better?
|
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
|
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
I can't believe you have Odum's book. I spent several weekends at his cabin in the woods here, sadly after his death. If you know that much ecology, you can work out how different terrain types result in different mating systems - there are plenty of papers about. You can even do the equations for different strategies, via something like the hawk dove game, etc. At one point I was planning on running something like that as an agent based model through Rouge, but then I went to prison so that didn't happen. |
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
In going for a eusocial species I'm already going outside of normal hominid or even primate patterns. And I'm not sure why it would be advantageous for an older female dwarf with a big family to have homosexual sons, but not for a younger female dwarf with a small family. Clarify? Quote:
I don't actually own Odum. I have a university library that has his book. It's a splendid resource and I'd like to have the spare money to buy a copy someday. Bill Stoddard |
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
For one* group, typo. By which I would guess one of the more robust species, trolls or ghouls, or add something else, like on a different continent or minor biome. I believe that orangutans use forced copulation, but this may be due to their near extinction. That's pretty distasteful, thus the vagina dentata. But then you're wondering off a cliff with weird sexuality, which can be squicky, a la Wreaththu.
On thinking about it, it makes more sense for the first born sons to be nonreproductive, if they are to care for their nieces and nephews. Or be mates to the mountain kami. IMHO, gay dwarves lack the squick factor. |
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
Re: theme for a fantasy campaign
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.