01-19-2019, 10:47 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Using Spaceships it'll probably have two TL9+ fusion systems, each massing 150,000 tons, and costing $30 billion.
Each of those forty 100GJ lasers masses ~15,000 tons and costs $1.5 billion. Just the weapons and power supply for them costs $120 billion. The whole ship is probably about $400 billion (so about three years procurement spending for the US military). Even for a TL9-10 multi-system empire it's not a minor asset, and I suspect that with four secondary laser batteries it's a fairly specialised ship.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
01-19-2019, 11:11 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Assuming the space laser works as the OP described, the Earth's best chance is to overaaturate the laser's defenses with massive nuclear assault. Have the US and Russia launch all their remaining nukes at it at once, assuming ICBMs could pull off that altitude. Depending on genre, that can be handwaved. It is doubtful it could shoot down a couple thousand missiles at once, if it is decked out the way the OP describes.
Of course, if it has even ine point defence system, that would fail, too, and Earth is just doomed.
__________________
Buy My Stuff! Free Stuff: Dungeon Action! Totem Spirits My Blog: Above the Flatline. |
01-19-2019, 11:44 PM | #13 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buffalo, New York
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
Just curious. |
|
01-20-2019, 02:04 AM | #14 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
As for getting them shot down, The travel time will give plenty of time to shoot them with a battery capable for 120 shots per minute.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
01-20-2019, 02:10 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
With a spacecraft of these characteristics, anyone could get the governments of the world to accept all kinds of proposals as long as they are not eradicated.
|
01-20-2019, 02:22 AM | #16 | |
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
Whereas a small nuke might need to be within a few hundred meters to score a single-hit kill purely based on the thermal effects, the neutrinos and radiation would kill or sicken the crew if it goes off within kilometers of the target. Considering the limited time to prepare, I'd recommend that everyone on the far side of the earth when the attack began should prepare literally every spaceflight capable rocket (from ICBMs to sounding rockets or even models) to launch simultaneously. As many of those as possible should be armed with nuclear warheads. As many of the armed missiles as is reasonably possible should have their re-entry shield replaced with graphite or other refractory materials, which will ablatively shield the missile. Hopefully, the large scale of the wave will provide sacrificial targets that will take the initial brunt of the attack. The graphite will boil away, taking a great deal of energy with it. Hard to estimate how it will hold up to high-energy lasers (the spot size, pulse duration, wavelength, etc, etc, are unknown), but maybe it'll give you a chance. This goes out the window with an alien ship, but still, people would give it a try. |
|
01-20-2019, 03:08 AM | #17 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
||
01-20-2019, 06:37 AM | #18 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
I agree. The neutrons produced by neutron bombs tend to be in the keV range, so a meter of liquid hydrogen will absorb them quite nicely. Also, any carbon-based armor would be quite fine, as it would also absorb the neutrons without issue.
Anyway, why would anyone want a neutron bomb? They are quite literally the most useless nuclear weapon. Their only utility in warfare was a marginal increase in the radioactivity of the detonation site, as the metals in the area become somewhat radioactive, but it greatly reduced the destruction power of a nuclear weapon to do so. It was why the US shelved the neutron bomb program after billions of dollars of development, because it was a less than useful weapon. |
01-20-2019, 07:48 AM | #19 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
01-20-2019, 08:06 AM | #20 | |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
In that case, the aliens would probably just want to make sure that nothing leaves the atmosphere of the Earth. They would probably vaporize anything substantial in orbit, just in case it was a hidden weapons platform, which would play havoc with communications, GPS, weather forecasting, etc. After cleaning out the orbits of Earth, it would proceed to remove any launch capabilities of the Earth, probably targeting any ICBMs or similar weapon systems. When it was done with removing launch capabilities, it would probably just maintain watch over the Earth from GSO, in case humanity tried anything clever. |
|
|
|