06-02-2011, 06:41 AM | #1 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Did you find WoD Shapeshifters' Animal Attraction ability annoying?
Greetings, all!
Just curious: those of you who played/GMed/'storytold' World of Darkness with various Changing Breeds - did you find the ability annoying? I've seen some groups report it was mostly a tool of distractions, others kinda ignored it (out of fear of the GM making NPCs targets 'serendipitously' have a hidden agenda conflicting with the PCs'), others had it low-key, yet others claimed to use it to gain Renown/Wisdom or some other. The Ananasi Breedbook seemed to imply that werespiders made more uses of it than Garou, but it's not clear. What's your stance on all of it? Thanks in advance! Last edited by vicky_molokh; 06-06-2011 at 03:45 PM. Reason: stupid double negation |
06-06-2011, 03:24 PM | #2 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
Re: Did you find WoD Shapeshifters' Animal Attraction ability annoying?
Hey.
Quote:
Quote:
Haven't read that splatbook. Seems like a bit of a head-slapper, considering that the flavor text credits it to Rage, which Ananasi don't have... |
||
06-06-2011, 03:46 PM | #3 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Did you find WoD Shapeshifters' Animal Attraction ability annoying?
The breedbook explicitly points out that that even without rage, the Ananasi are still sexy predators. Only apparently more so than the Garou.
|
06-06-2011, 06:09 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
|
Re: Did you find WoD Shapeshifters' Animal Attraction ability annoying?
Quote:
There's a huge, sprawling debate with much fist-typing over at RPG.net, buried in a broader Werewolf-dislike topic, that I just had the misfortune to get sucked into reading due to a combination of masochism and fatigue, regarding whether or not using Animal Attraction to initiate a sexual encounter constitutes an act of rape, a question that seems better left IC* in my humble opinion. If somebody in a game I was running felt so strongly about the issue that it was a deal-breaker I would most certainly not consider it too vital to the setting to leave out, but I would have to ask them why they're playing a dark game about people who do horrible, horrible things. *The sole PC-On-PC incident that I GMd involved explicit OOC pre-consent on all sides, of course, though one of the players ended up being extremely butthurt a short time later - Specifically, the guy with Animal Attraction, after the female Kinfolk he used it to seduce ratted him out to a higher-Rank Ahroun who fancied her and the Ahroun used violent means to, ah, ensure that it wouldn't happen again. |
|
06-07-2011, 05:23 AM | #5 | ||
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Did you find WoD Shapeshifters' Animal Attraction ability annoying?
Quote:
Quote:
Heck, it's not even that much better than straight seduction. Compare: Animal Attraction: something like Charisma+Primal_Urge, difficulty Willpower. It is an extended roll that requires an accumulation of Willpower successes, and a failure at any point makes the subject aware something is wrong and avoid the shapeshifter. Seduction: Appearance + Subterfuge, Difficulty Wits+3. Successes + Wits + Subterfuge, difficulty Int+3. Success + Charisma + Empathy, difficulty Per+3. Yeah, Seduction takes three rolls, but adds successes from previous rolls to the next roll. Also, while Animal Attraction is used against a difficulty ranging 1-10, Seduction only encounters a difficulty range of 1-8. In case of seduction, difficulty above 6 is not very likely against mortals. Last edited by vicky_molokh; 06-07-2011 at 06:35 AM. Reason: found the precise game mechanics |
||
Tags |
werespiders, werewolves, world of darkness |
|
|