10-07-2015, 08:44 PM | #51 | |
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Quote:
More generally you could have "constantly makes references to some literature/media around people who can't be expected to be familiar with it." But I don't see how you could get that to -15. |
|
10-07-2015, 09:00 PM | #52 |
Join Date: Feb 2013
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
How about: being a celebrity?
__________________
Leave this space blank. |
10-07-2015, 09:10 PM | #53 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Quote:
Throwing in non-English words into common speech can quickly get annoying. But verbal habits just seem incapable of rising to top tier OPH.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
10-07-2015, 10:16 PM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Usually, in an occupied country (e.g. Nazi occupied Euroe) that's merely a reprehensible form of prostitution (the occupying soldiers are the ones with the chocolate, nylon stockings and so forth, so it's reasonable to suspect that such women have an economic motivation for their choice of sexual partners).
Or if you happen to think that all prostitution is reprehensible, then that particular form is merely extra reprehensible. It's not -15. Although it may well net you a serious Enemy disadvantage. |
10-07-2015, 10:19 PM | #55 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Quote:
|
|
10-07-2015, 10:22 PM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
As in being famous?
Or specifically as in famous for being famous without actually having any kind of actual talent that makes you stand out (e.g. skill, or Talent with a capital "T", or high Appearance, or some other fairly rare advantage)? Even in the 2nd case, it can only be an OPH if the celebrity constantly tries to remind everyone that he is a celebrity. |
10-07-2015, 10:53 PM | #57 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Maybe I really just prefer somewhere else as a place for mediocre snack food?
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
10-07-2015, 11:36 PM | #58 |
Join Date: Oct 2014
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
|
10-08-2015, 01:13 AM | #59 |
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Philippines
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
These are some great ideas. I think one of the first ones I'll use is
"Pointing your loaded weapon at people for emphasis while speaking". That's a great one for the character I'm thinking of.
__________________
I have the GURPS Fanatic mental disadvantage [-15 points] |
10-08-2015, 08:34 AM | #60 |
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota, USA
|
Re: Odious Personal Habits
Turkey hotdogs exist as well; I haven't ever seen them sold as a fully prepared, ready to eat snack/light meal but simply as an item to pick up at the store, locally you can find them at any "non-minor" grocer. Well, any where I have bothered looking.
Getting back on topic, I am seeing something of a disconnect where some seem to insist on OPHs that really ratchet up the danger... but the cost of OPHs are based on the reaction penalty: -5 points per -1 reaction penalty, the standard guideline for GURPS. They do not have to be as overly dangerous as other specific Disadvantages because they usually inconvenience you in a different manner. If it seems like a bargain, then it would be nice if some of the posts insisting for -15 points your OPH should be provoking attacks from otherwise "average" citizens could mention they also think similarly priced social traits shouldn't be worth more than -15 points or explain to a confused otaku why there is a difference. Basic Set: Characters provides no examples of -15 point traits. There are some being mentioned in the thread, and I recognize them from 3e. Between being from a supplement (as opposed to the core rules) and being "grandfathered" in, there seems sufficient room for error; perhaps some of the more problematic ones go above and beyond what is minimally required for a -15 point Odious Personal Habit. Or perhaps too much is being read into them; just because an Ogre has a Odious Racial Habit of "Eats Other Sentients" good for -15 points doesn't mean a human with the same thing as an Odious Racial Habit is going to have to be a murderer; while difficult and expensive such a person may procure human meat in a legal manner (in some settings, rather easily). To move a "neutral" reaction to being attacked requires a lot of negative modifiers. The -3 to reaction rolls a -15 point OPH yields will make you more likely to be attacked, but without anything else, it just shifts the results on p. B560 up by one: "Neutral" requires rolling a 13 to 15 because after the penalty it becomes a 7 to 10, "Poor" happens on a roll of 10 to 12 because after the penalty is applied it is a 7 to 9, etc.
__________________
My GURPS Fourth Edition library consists of Basic Set: Characters, Basic Set: Campaigns, Martial Arts, Powers, Powers: Enhanced Senses, Power-Ups 1: Imbuements, Power-Ups 2: Perks, Power-Ups 3: Talents, Power-Ups 4: Enhancements, Power-Ups 6: Quirks, Power-Ups 8: Limitations, Powers, Social Engineering, Supers, Template Toolkit 1: Characters, Template Toolkit 2: Races, one issue of Pyramid (3/83) a.k.a. Alternate GURPS IV, GURPS Classic Rogues, and GURPS Classic Warriors. Most of which was provided through the generosity of others. Thanks! :) Last edited by Otaku; 10-08-2015 at 08:44 AM. |
Tags |
disadvantage, disadvantages, mental disadvantage, odious personal habit |
|
|