Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2016, 11:23 AM   #11
PTTG
 
PTTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyndaran View Post
There is absolutely no evidence for them using exhaust spewing reaction mass like that. Even if they specifically mentioned that that was their technology... which I don't particularly remember on screen.
ST:TNG did misuse real terms more often than even original series making it feel a bit more dated, in my opinion. Remember their amazing massive computer that could hold some absurdly tiny amount of data like a terabyte or something?
I think we're being Watsonian, in which case we can assume that the dialog was filtered through fail-able modern writers and limited by the expense of special effects.
PTTG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:03 PM   #12
gruundehn
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

I have the FASA Star Trek RPG and the supplement on building spaceships deals also with shuttles. The engines on the shuttles, according to FASA, are miniature versions of the engines on the starships. Thus, the shuttles can warp and fly normally in space just as a starship can. How does a starship maneuver? Whatever it is, the shuttle uses the same procedure, space atmosphere or whatever. The shuttles lift off from a landing pad using the same procedure regardless if the landing pad is on the ground or in a docking bay.
__________________
The World's Tallest Dwarf
gruundehn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:27 PM   #13
Captain Joy
 
Captain Joy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrash View Post
Except the whole plot of The Galileo Seven, anyway -- especially the resolution.

In general, though, the episode isn't very helpful: shuttles run on battery power, that can be recharged from phasers?
My recollection about that episode is that the concerns were with lowering mass and having enough energy. I don't remember anything about reaction mass.
Captain Joy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:31 PM   #14
Captain Joy
 
Captain Joy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyndaran View Post
There is absolutely no evidence for them using exhaust spewing reaction mass like that. Even if they specifically mentioned that that was their technology... which I don't particularly remember on screen.
ST:TNG did misuse real terms more often than even original series making it feel a bit more dated, in my opinion. Remember their amazing massive computer that could hold some absurdly tiny amount of data like a terabyte or something?
My understanding is that fusion reactors do power the impulse drives. In my campaigns at least, the impulse drives are fusion engines.
Captain Joy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:48 PM   #15
thrash
 
thrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: traveller
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Joy View Post
My recollection about that episode is that the concerns were with lowering mass and having enough energy. I don't remember anything about reaction mass.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memory Alpha
When they achieve orbital altitude, while chasing the Enterprise, Scott estimates they have enough fuel to maintain it for 45 minutes. At this point, Spock commits an act of desperation. He jettisons the fuel and ignites it in the hope that the Enterprise might see the flare and come to their rescue.
The Galileo Seven
thrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:57 PM   #16
Gedrin
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

I assume ST impulse engines work like fusion powered rockets in the same way nuclear submarine turbines work like tea kettles.
Gedrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 03:58 PM   #17
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

The presence of fuel doesn't seem to imply reaction mass, necessarily.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 04:05 PM   #18
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTTG View Post
I think we're being Watsonian, in which case we can assume that the dialog was filtered through fail-able modern writers and limited by the expense of special effects.
It's a big reason why certain gaming companies decided to avoid any and all real world measurements when creating new editions. ;)
Everything 3rd edition and Ultra tech now sounds very dated. Some retro feeling is unavoidable, and I'd be fine just adjusting numbers to suit whatever the present becomes, but using all sorts of made up units like Power Points in Spaceships avoids that particular problem all together.

Of course it leads to other issues like writers having to unconsciously or consciously use some kind of relationship to reality and therefore disagreement between products when someone does the math. Spaceships has Solar Plants producing over 100 times the power they could, and some others at least 10 times.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 04:08 PM   #19
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Joy View Post
My understanding is that fusion reactors do power the impulse drives. In my campaigns at least, the impulse drives are fusion engines.
As Ulzgoroth mentions above, power is not always reaction mass source.
Fusion power is where your energy comes from but not necessarily where your exhaust mass does.
The default Gurps fusion drive uses nuclear fusion for power but stored hydrogen for reaction mass. Or it could use water, ammonia, etc. for differing thrusts and delta velocities.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2016, 04:16 PM   #20
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: Star Trek Shuttles

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrash View Post
Except the whole plot of The Galileo Seven, anyway -- especially the resolution.

In general, though, the episode isn't very helpful: shuttles run on battery power, that can be recharged from phasers?
I just looked at the Wikipedia entry for the episode as my memory is foggy. It says that they jettisoned and ignited their fuel. Fuel is not normal exhaust for most drives. So assuming that write up is correct, my statement still fits.

One could, grasping at straws here, conclude that phasers gave the required energy for the start up like how one may need to jump a car battery even though it mainly runs on gas.

Or again, sci fi writers not really getting or caring about massive differences in scales. Tiny pew pew vs. monumental energy required for planetary lift off. They wanted intentional helplessness for the story conflict, so just kludged a nice technobabble reason.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
star trek, star trek spaceships


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.